Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cortex. 2011 Sep 1;48(10):1329–1341. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.08.003

Table 3.

Theory of mind components and diagnostic groups’ impairment information

Level Other’s thought content Modality of presentation Construct Test Score Impaired groups, when controlling for other cognitive deficits
1 Knowledge of objective facts Explicitly verbalized and presented Visual perspective taking (explicit) UCSF ToM: perspective taking items bvFTD
2 Knowledge of objective facts Implicitly presented Visual perspective taking (implicit) SI-E: “think” score across visual cue items bvFTD
3 Mental opinion Explicitly verbalized Theory of mind SI-E: “think” score across verbal cue items bvFTD; PSP
4 Mental intention Implicitly presented Theory of mind SI-E: “do” score across all items bvFTD; PSP*
5 Emotion Implicitly presented Emotion reading SI-E “feel” score across all items bvFTD

Note: Group impairment was determined using GLM controlling for age, sex, education, MMSE, and the control task score (UCSF ToM perspective taking score controlling for control score, SI-E scores controlling for SI-M sincere score), with Dunnet-Hsu post-hoc tests.

*

PSP patients were only marginally impaired in inferring the mental intention on verbal cue items (p=.072) but not on visual cue items (ns)