Table 1. Comparison of materials used in total hip arthroplasty.
Prosthesis | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
Metal-on-polyethylene | Large volume of evidence to support use Predictable lifespan Cost effective | Polyethylene debris leading to aseptic loosening |
Metal-on-metal | Potentially longer lifespan than polyethylene due to reduced wear Larger femoral head - therefore lower dislocation rate | Metallosis Potential carcinogenic effect of metal ions |
Ceramic-on-ceramic | Low friction Low debris particles Inert substance | Expensive Require expert insertion to prevent early damage Can produce noise on movement |