Skip to main content
. 2011 May 4;3(5):515–528. doi: 10.3390/nu3050515

Table 4.

Summary table of logistic regression results when breakfast frequency and frequency of unhealthy snacking were included in the model.

Outcome (N = 809) Variable Model χ2 a Goodness of fit b Odds ratio 95% confidence limits P value
Accident at work Breakfast χ2(3) = 23.18 χ2(5) = 2.19 0.45 0.26-0.78 0.005
Minor injury at work Breakfast χ2(5) = 73.37 χ2(8) = 3.77 0.66 0.47-0.92 0.015
Unhealthy snacking 1.95 1.40-2.71 0.000
Minor injury outside work Unhealthy snacking χ2(4) = 31.99 χ2(8) = 4.01 1.54 1.14-2.09 0.005
Cognitive failures at work Breakfast χ2(4) = 46.25 χ2(7) = 9.16 0.68 0.48-0.96 0.026
Cognitive failures outside work Unhealthy snacking χ2(4) = 43.20 χ2(8) = 16.81 1.51 1.07-2.12 0.018
Work stress Breakfast χ2(6) = 101.46 χ2(8) = 5.72 0.56 0.39-0.81 0.002
Unhealthy snacking 1.61 1.13-2.29 0.008
Stress in life in general Unhealthy snacking χ2(3) = 98.50 χ2(6) = 1.63 1.57 1.15-2.16 0.005

a p < 0.001; b p > 0.05.