Table 1.
Sample | Neo | Lut | XC | DEPs% | chl a/b | NPQ |
Dark Vio | 45 ± 2.8 | 122 ± 3 | 50 ± 2.8 | 0 | 3.5 ± 0.1 | 0 |
Light Vio | 44 ± 1.6 | 122 ± 2 | 49 ± 1.1 | 0 | 3.4 ± 0.09 | 0.6 ± 0.1* |
Light Zea | 45 ± 1.1 | 121 ± 2 | 49 ± 1.3 | 35 ± 1.3* | 3.5 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.1* |
Dark Zea | 46 ± 0.8 | 120 ± 3 | 49 ± 2.1 | 36 ± 3.7* | 3.5 ± 0.07 | 0.3 ± 0.03* |
Light + nigericin | 44 ± 2.4 | 121 ± 3 | 50 ± 2.3 | 0 | 3.4 ± 0.1 | 0 |
Chloroplasts devoid of zeaxanthin and antheraxanthin (Vio) and chloroplasts enriched in zeaxanthin (Zea) were light treated for 5 min at 350 µmol photons m−2 s−1 to form NPQ and then either immediately frozen for pigment analysis (Light Vio and Light Zea chloroplasts) or given a further 5 min of darkness to allow NPQ to relax prior to freezing for pigment analysis. A separate sample of Vio chloroplasts were light treated at 350 µmol photons m−2 s−1 for 5 min in the presence of 2 µM nigericin (Light + nigericin). Data are expressed as mmoles carotenoids per mole chlorophyll a + b molecules and are means ± S.E.M. from four replicates. Neo, Lut, XC, DEPs and chl a/b, NPQ: correspond to neoxanthin, lutein, xanthophyll cycle carotenoids (violaxanthin, antheraxanthin, zeaxanthin), xanthophyll cycle de-epoxidation state [(Z + 0.5A)/(V + A + Z)]%, chlorophyll a/b ratio, the amount non-photochemical quenching in each sample as calculated from chlorophyll fluorescence traces as shown in Figure 1. Statistical confidence levels *indicates significantly different with respect to dark adapted sample p < 0.01, using an AN OVA analysis (Tukey contrast).