Table 2.
Coaxial stacking prediction | 3-way junctions (%) | 4-way junctions (%) |
No assumption on junction family | 81 | 77 |
Junction family assumed known | 83 | 87 |
Junction family prediction | 3-way junctions (%) | 4-way junctions (%) |
No assumption on coaxial stacking | 85 | 74 |
Coaxial stacking assumed known | 86 | 81 |
Coaxial stacking prediction | 5 to 10-way junction (%) | |
60 | ||
Two-step coaxial stacking prediction | 3-way junctions (%) | 4-way junctions (%) |
(junction family, stacking) | 82 | 80 |
Two-step junction family prediction | 3-way junctions (%) | 4-way junctions (%) |
(coaxial stacking, junction family) | 86 | 71 |
Prediction performance is shown for each experiment by determining junction family type for 3 and 4-way junctions and coaxial helical stacking for all junctions. Prediction values improve when knowledge of the junction family type or coaxial stacking is provided.