Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 23;9:172. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-9-172

Table 1.

Correlation of CEACAM 7 and CEA expression with clinicopathological characteristics of gastric carcinoma.

Variables CEACAM 7 P value CEA P value


Negative
(n = 100)
Positive
(n = 45)
Negative
(n = 81)
Positive
(n = 64)
Gender
Male 74(67.3%) 36(32.7%) 0.437 58(52.7%) 52(47.3%) 0.178
Female 26(74.3%) 9 (25.7%) 23(65.7%) 12(34.3%)
Age (Years)
(means ± SD) 59.8 ± 10.4 58.1 ± 13.3 0.608 60.3 ± 9.4 58.9 ± 12.9 0.512
Location of tumor
Upper 12(60.0%) 8 (40.0%) 0.601 9 (45.0%) 11(55.0%) 0.544
Middle 49(69.0%) 22(31.0%) 40(56.3%) 31(43.7%)
Lower 39(72.2%) 15(27.8%) 32(59.3%) 22(40.7%)
Histology †
Well and Moderate 56(80.0%) 14(20.0%) 0.006 43(61.4%) 27(38.6%) 0.741
Undifferentiated 44(58.7%) 31(41.3%) 38(50.7%) 37(49.3%)
Lauren's classification
Intestinal 56(77.8%) 16(22.2%) 0.023 39(54.2%) 33(45.8%) 0.683
Diffuse 44(60.3%) 29(39.7%) 42(57.5%) 31(42.5%)
Depth of tumor
T1-T2 28(75.7%) 9 (24.3%) 0.307 20(54.1%) 17(45.9%) 0.797
T3-T4 72(66.7%) 36(33.3%) 61(56.5%) 47(43.5%)
Node metastasis
Negative 59(72.8%) 22(27.2%) 0.257 37(67.3%) 18(32.7%) 0.031
Positive 41(64.1%) 23(35.9%) 44(48.9%) 46(51.1%)
Lymphatic invasion
Negative 44(75.9%) 14(24.1%) 0.143 35(60.3%) 23(39.7%) 0.375
Positive 56(64.4%) 31(35.6%) 46(52.9%) 41(47.1%)
Venous invasion
Negative 52(70.3%) 22(29.7%) 0.729 43(58.1%) 31(41.9%) 0.578
Positive 48(67.6%) 23(32.4%) 38(53.5%) 33(46.5%)
Tumor Stage
I- II 40(62.5%) 24(37.5%) 0.135 34(53.1%) 30(46.9%) 0.555
III- IV 60(74.1%) 21(25.9%) 47(58.0%) 34(42.0%)

NOTE: Pearson's X2 test was done to get P value except that Ages was compared by Student-T test. †Well = well differentiated carcinoma; moderately = moderately differentiated carcinoma; undifferentiated = poorly differentiated carcinoma, signet ring cell carcinoma, or mucinous carcinoma.