Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov;60(5):675–699. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9876.2011.00767.x

Table 6.

Intensity ratio and baseline intensity parameter estimates together with associated naive and robust 95% confidence intervals for the model that includes the effects of joint type, previous activity on transitions from state 1 and opposite damage on all transitions

Parameter Estimate 95% confidence interval

Naive Robust
Baseline intensities(×10−2)
λ012 9.24 (8.19, 10.43) (6.76, 12.63)
λ013 0.14 (0.07, 0.30) (0.04, 0.49)
λ021 151.48 (146.10, 157.10) (126.25, 181.76)
Intensity ratios
exp(γ) 21.72 (11.89, 39.69) (5.79, 81.46)
Metacarpophalangeal on 1→2 1.10 (0.99, 1.21) (0.82, 1.47)
Metacarpophalangeal on 1→3 0.37 (0.16, 0.86) (0.05, 2.75)
Proximal on 1→2 1.24 (1.12, 1.36) (0.96, 1.59)
Proximal on 1→3 1.04 (0.56, 1.94) (0.31, 3.52)
Distal on 1→2 0.86 (0.77, 0.95) (0.63, 1.16)
Distal on 1→3 2.82 (1.60, 4.96) (0.95, 8.36)
Thumb metacarpophalangeal on 1→2 1.26 (1.12, 1.42) (0.97, 1.63)
Thumb metacarpophalangeal on 1→3 2.68 (1.43, 5.04) (0.88, 8.13)
Joint ever active on 1→2 2.98 (2.84, 3.13) (2.13, 4.17)
Joint ever active on 1→3 3.07 (2.38, 3.96) (1.27, 7.40)
Opposite joint damage on 1→2 1.20 (1.01, 1.44) (0.64, 2.27)
Opposite joint damage on 1→3 7.19 (4.90, 10.54) (2.11, 24.44)
Opposite joint damage on 2→1 1.08 (0.91, 1.28) (0.64, 1.82)
Opposite joint damage on 2→3 7.50 (5.08, 11.09) (2.40, 23.46)