Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pain. 2011 Nov 9;12(12):1262–1273. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.08.010

Table 3.

Rates of change in pupil and skin conductance responses by task condition at three levels of trait anxiety and absorption

Anxiety
Low Moderate High
PDR Intercept
(S.E.)
Slope
(S.E.)
Intercept
(S.E.)
Slope
(S.E.)
Intercept
(S.E.)
Slope
(S.E.)
Absorption Low 34.52 (3.50) −2.95 (1.54) 31.45 (2.20) 0.87 (0.67) 28.37 (4.05) 4.70 (1.88)
Moderate 33.28 (2.20) −0.60 (0.67) 34.31 (1.85) −0.21 (0.29) 35.34 (2.22) 0.18 (0.71)
High 32.05 (3.33) 1.75 (1.44) 37.18 (2.17) −1.30 (0.65) 42.31 (3.20) −4.34 (1.37)
SCR
Absorption Low 87.73 (8.03) 2.18 (1.76) 80.54 (5.80) 7.36 (0.79) 73.34 (9.25) 12.54 (2.22)
Moderate 83.93 (5.80) 5.38 (0.78) 82.30 (5.24) 5.85 (0.35) 80.66 (5.84) 6.33 (0.81)
High 80.12 (7.90) 8.57 (1.70) 84.05 (5.79) 4.34 (0.78) 87.98 (7.68) 0.11 (1.63)

All values adjusted for habituation/sensitization; intercepts calculated at stimulus level = high. Anxiety values obtained at −2 (Low), 0 (Moderate), and +2 (High) standard deviations in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait measures; Absorption values obtained at −2 (Low), 0 (Moderate), and +2 (High) standard deviations in Tellegen Absorption Scale measures.

Abbreviations: PDR= pupil dilation response; SCR= skin conductance response; S.E.= standard error