Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am Heart J. 2012 Jan;163(1):88–94.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.09.027

Table 3.

Correlations Between Changes in Health Status and Changes in Functional Capacity

Health Status and Functional Capacity 3 Months, r (95% CI)* 12 Months, r (95% CI)*
KCCQ overall score
 Peak VO2, mL/kg/min 0.29 (0.21 to 0.39) 0.31 (0.24 to 0.39)
 6-minute walk distance, m 0.26 (0.20 to 0.34)c 0.31 (0.26 to 0.38) c
KCCQ subscales
 Physical limitation
  Peak VO2, mL/kg/min 0.28 (0.19 to 0.40) 0.32 (0.25 to 0.41)
  6-minute walk distance, m 0.31 (0.23 to 0.42) 0.34 (0.28 to 0.43)
 Symptoms
  Peak VO2, mL/kg/min 0.26 (0.18 to 0.35) 0.27 (0.20 to 0.35)c
  6-minute walk distance, m 0.25 (0.17 to 0.35)c 0.29 (0.22 to 0.37) c
 Quality of life
  Peak VO2, mL/kg/min 0.24 (0.15 to 0.34)c 0.26 (0.18 to 0.34)c
  6-minute walk distance, m 0.18 (0.11 to 0.25)c 0.23 (0.17 to 0.30)c
 Social limitation
  Peak VO2, mL/kg/min 0.28 (0.20 to 0.38) 0.30 (0.23 to 0.38)
  6-minute walk distance, m 0.22 (0.16 to 0.30)c 0.29 (0.23 to 0.37)c
EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale
 Peak VO2, mL/kg/min 0.13 (0.02 to 0.25) 0.16 (0.07 to 0.27)
 6-minute walk distance, m 0.18 (0.07 to 0.31) 0.28 (0.19, to 0.39)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; KCCQ, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire.

*

Adjusted for all significant patient characteristics listed in Table 1 and their interactions.

Confidence intervals estimated using the bootstrap method with replacement and constructed using the bias-corrected and accelerated method.

Correlation coefficient significantly different from corresponding coefficient with KCCQ physical limitation subscale at P < .05.