Table 7.
Reference | N | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV % | NPV % | LR | Diagnostic Accuracy % | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLIP 15 variable model | 59 | 550 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 56 | 83 | 2.56 | 72 |
FLIP Final 8 variable model | 59 | 489 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 58 | 84 | 2.66 | 73 |
Munich 7 variable model | 59 | 370 | 0.88 | 0.72 | 13 | 99 | 3.17 | 73 |
French 7 variable model | 61 | 231 | 0.51 | 0.68 | 44 | 73 | 1.59 | 63 |
French 8 variable model including ‘pets at home’ | 61 | 231 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 48 | 80 | 1.86 | 65 |
French 8 variable model including ‘day care outside the home’ | 61 | 231 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 46 | 76 | 1.67 | 63 |
French 8 variable model including ‘number of smokers’ | 61 | 231 | 0.53 | 0.64 | 42 | 73 | 1.46 | 60 |
Italian 6 variable model | 62 | 56 | 0.83 | 0.70 | 75 | 79 | 2.79 | 77 |
Danish 7 Variable Model | 60 | 2529 | 66 |
PPV = positive predictive value
NPV = negative predictive value
LR = likelihood ratio of a positive test
Number of children at school was used in place of number of siblings over two years old.