Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 2;93(2):242–251. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvr292

Table 1.

Electrophysiological effects of myofibroblast coupling on myocyte resting membrane potential (RMP) and action potential duration (APD90).

Combination Cf (pF) Ef (mV) Gj (nS) ΔRMP (mV, n) ΔAPD90 (ms, n)
1 (fibroblast) 6.3 −50 0.3 +0.2 ± 0.1 (40) −5 ± 5 (25)
2 (fibroblast) 6.3 −50 3.0 +0.3 ± 0.2 (35) −21 ± 15 (29)
3 (fibroblast) 6.3 −25 0.3 +0.9 ± 0.4 (25) −10 ± 9 (20)
4 (fibroblast) 6.3 −25 3.0 +2.8 ± 1.6 (50) −6 ± 6 (24)
5 (myofibroblast) 50.0 −50 0.3 +0.5 ± 0.3 (33) −7 ± 6 (27)
6 (myofibroblast) 50.0 −50 3.0 +1.3 ± 0.7 (23) −45 ± 15 (31)
7 (myofibroblast) 50.0 −25 0.3 +1.0 ± 0.2 (23) −2 ± 2 (13)
8 (myofibroblast) 50.0 −25 3.0 +2.4 ± 1.6 (41) −12 ± 13 (35)

Coupling of rabbit ventricular myocytes to a virtual fibroblast or myofibroblast by dynamic clamp under control conditions using eight different coupling combinations slightly depolarized the myocyte resting membrane (less negative RMP) and shortened APD90 during PCL 1 s. Results are reported as mean ± SD.