Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb;53(2):144–150.

Table 2.

Summary of zoonotic events reported by all participating veterinarians with animal contact in their employment including personal experiences and animal diagnoses

Reported zoonotic diseases Veterinarians reporting that they had been diagnosed with specific zoonosis N = 775 Prevalence of personal zoonosesa Province(s) from which personal zoonoses were reportedb Veterinarians reporting a diagnosis of specific zoonosis in animals N = 776 Prevalence of diagnosing an animal zoonosesa Province(s) from which animal zoonoses were reportedb
Anthrax 7 0.9% AB, SK, MB 63 8.1% AB, SK, MB
Bartonella 6 0.8% AB, MB 52 6.7% AB, SK, MB
Blastomycosis 1 0.1% SK 9 1.1% SK, MB
Brucellosis (canine) 1 0.1% AB 9 1.1% AB, SK
Campylobacteriosis 14 2.0% AB, SK 221 28.4% AB, SK, MB
Cryptosporidiosis 6 0.8% AB, SK, MB 221 28.4% AB, SK, MB
Giardia 7 0.9% AB, SK, MB 430 55.4% AB, SK, MB
Leptospirosis 0 0% 53 6.8% AB, SK, MB
MRSAc 6 0.8% AB, SK 56 7.2% AB, SK, MB
Q-fever 0 0% 11 1.4% AB, SK, MB
Rabiesd 21 2.7% AB, SK, MB 99 12.8% AB, SK, MB
Ringworm 59 7.6% AB, SK, MB 591 76.1% AB, SK, MB
West Nile Virus 2 0.3% SK, MB 178 22.9% AB, SK, MB

N — number of responses.

a

Prevalence was calculated as the number of individuals reporting a particular zoonosis at least once during the 5-year study period as a percentage of the total number of study participants who answered the question on the survey.

b

AB — Alberta, SK — Saskatchewan, MB — Manitoba.

c

MRSA — methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

d

Rabies reported in humans refers to administration of post-exposure treatment not clinical diagnosis.