Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Health Place. 2012 Jan;18(1):63–70. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.08.013

Table 6.

Regression models for IPAQ walking, IPAQ total and accelerometer physical activity

Regression Modela β t p
T2 IPAQ Walking
 Group .752 2.173 .032
 Traffic Control Devices .216 1.675 .097
 Group*Traffic Control Devices −.801 −2.189 .031
T2 IPAQ Walking
 Group −.081 −.771 .443
 Amenities −.427 −2.416 .018
 Group*Amenities .454 2.506 .014
T2 IPAQ Total
 Group .318 2.972 .004
 Crossing Aids .123 1.257 .211
 Group*Crossing Aids −.456 −3.755 .000
T2 IPAQ Total
 Group −.073 −.813 .418
 Amenities −.167 −1.430 .155
 Group*Amenities .326 2.622 .010
T2 Accelerometer
 Group 1.079 1.207 .233
 Attractive for Walking .329 2.211 .031
 Group*Attractive for Walking −1.003 −1.121 .268
T2 Accelerometer
 Group 1.008 1.159 .252
 Attractive for Cycling .341 2.421 .019
 Group*Attractive for Cycling −.901 −1.045 .301
a

All regression models included T1 physical activity, age, education, income, ethnicity and site.