Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 3;2012:467892. doi: 10.1100/2012/467892

Table 4.

Comparison between patients with different localizations of chondromalacia (retropatellar n = 6 or medial femoral condyle n = 8).

Criterion Medial femoral condyle Retropatellar Significance (P)
Age 30.73 ± 10.85 35.49 ± 12.64 0.6982*
Gender (f/m) 2/3 3/5 0.9999#
ICRS score 3.75 ± 0.46 3.17 ± 0.41 0.0374*
Defect size 4.09 ± 1.79 3.29 ± 0.94 0.1882*
KOSS (MRI) 8.12 ± 2.17 5.5 ± 0.87 0.0201*
Henderson score 2.87 ± 1.36 2.00 ± 0.89 0.1826*
Kellgren-Lawrence score 0.75 ± 0.89 1.00 ± 0.00 0.3838*
Duration of symptoms (months) 65.25 ± 37.84 32.33 ± 21.55 0.0515*
Krenn score 2.25 ± 1.28 2.00 ± 1.26 0.6836*
BMP-2-Syn 2.62 ± 2.26 2.17 ± 1.60 0.9427*
BMP-2-C 2.00 ± 1.19 2.33 ± 2.06 1.000*
BMPR-1A-Syn 5.25 ± 0.89 4.50 ± 0.84 0.1279*
BMPR-1A-C 2.50 ± 2.26 2.50 ± 1.76 0.8860*
Mankin score 8.00 ± 3.34 7.67 ± 0.82 0.8943*
Pritzker score 4.00 ± 1.41 3.17 ± 0.41 0.2810*

*U-Test (Mann-Whitney), #Fisher exact test, f: female, m: male, Syn: synovia, C: cartilage.