Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 23;31(12):4360–4366. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6604-10.2011

Table 3.

Within-group comparisons for the high-risk group contrasting differences in the food reward paradigm and the monetary reward paradigm

Contrast and region k Z value MNI coordinates
Milkshake receipt > tasteless solution receipt
    Superior parietal lobe 766 4.41 12, −42, 78
    Amygdala 66 3.80 −27, −3, −15
7 3.80 30, −3, −9
    Postcentral gyrus 743 4.63 −42, −33, 63
    Rolandic operculum 177 4.48 42, −33, 45
    Temporal operculum 96 4.28 −57, −15, 9
    Caudate 17 4.20 6, 12, 24
    Frontal operculum 11 3.85 48, 6, 21
9 3.80 −45, 3, 21
    Inferior parietal lobe 36 3.80 27, −54, 39
    Putamen 12 3.70 −27, 3, 12
    Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex 5 3.51 39, 42, 50
    Thalamus, ventral lateral nucleus 4 3.37 15, −15, 6
    Medial orbitofrontal cortex 3 3.15 33, 36, −6
Unpaired milkshake cue > unpaired tasteless cue
    Occipital lobe 74 4.82 −12, 90,0
32 3.82 33, −69, −3
    Cuneus 56 3.82 21,–90,3
    Posterior cingulate gyrus 25 3.59 −6,-57,24
Winning > neutral
Posterior cingulate gyrus extending into occipital lobe 1289 6.14 18, −63, 12
    Anterior cingulate cortex 18 4.22 0, 12, 42
    Precentral gyrus 5 3.91 51, −9, 57
    Superior temporal gyrus 3 3.55 −60, −57, 15
Impending win > neutral
    Occipital lobe 264 5.15 −3, −75, 9
    Superior temporal gyrus 4 3.43 −60, −57, 15

For all contrasts, activated regions, number of contiguous voxels (k), Z values, and coordinates of the voxel of greatest activation within the MNI coordinate system are displayed. Peaks within the regions were considered significant at p < 0.001, uncorrected for multiple comparisons.