Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. 2011 Dec 12;12:469. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-469

Table 1.

Comparison of performances of different methods on simple models of pure epistatic interactions

	SNPInterForest		BOOST		SNPHarvester
	# of true positives (N_total= 50)	# of false positives	# of true positives (N_total= 50)	# of false positives	# of true positives (N_total= 50)	# of false positives
h²= 0.4, MAF = 0.2	50	0	50	6	37	0
h²= 0.4, MAF = 0.4	50	0	50	9	38	0
h²= 0.3, MAF = 0.2	50	0	50	1	36	0
h²= 0.3, MAF = 0.4	50	0	50	5	38	0
h²= 0.2, MAF = 0.2	49	1	50	1	36	0
h²= 0.2, MAF = 0.4	49	0	50	5	39	1

	# of true positives (N_total= 5)	# of false positives	# of true positives (N_total= 5)	# of false positives	# of true positives (N_total= 5)	# of false positives

3SNP interaction	5	0	-	-	0	0