Table 3. Relative method performance based on empirical data.
Data set | NJ (liberal) | NJ (strict) | PAR (liberal) | PAR (strict) | NN | BLAST | DNA-BAR | BLOG |
Drosophila (118) | 83.90 | 80.51 | 83.90 | 80.51 | 82.20 | 83.90 | 83.90 | 96.61 |
Inga (172) | 91.28 | 90.12 | 81.40 | 80.23 | 88.37 | 82.56 | 94.19 | 90.12 |
Cypraeidae (354) | 91.53 | 90.40 | 85.31 | 83.90 | 91.24 | 92.66 | 93.22 | 92.66 |
Overall | 88.90 | 87.01 | 83.53 | 81.55 | 87.27 | 86.37 | 90.43 | 93.13 |
DNA barcode query identification success scores (%) of six methods applied to three empirical data sets. NJ = neighbor joining, PAR = parsimony, NN = nearest neighbor (liberal) = liberal assessment, (strict) = strict assessment. Number of query sequences in each data set is in brackets. Overall success scores (bottom line) are averaged over the three data sets. Highest scores are in boldface.