Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Jun 7;59(6):1019–1031. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03450.x

Table 2.

Subgroup Meta-Analysis of Memantine and Falls, Syncope, and Related Events.

Study Characteristics (P for interaction*) No of Studies Treated (n / N) Placebo (n / N) Pooled OR (95% CI) P for Heterogeneity I2
Fall
Type of cognitive impairment (P for interaction = 0.728)
    AD 8 130 / 1609 135 / 1427 0.94 (0.72, 1.22) 0.64 0%
    VD or mixed dementia 1 18 / 277 21 / 271 0.83 (0.43, 1.59) - -
    PDD or DLB 0 - - - - -
    MCI 0 - - - - -

Severity of cognitive impairment (P for interaction = 0.475)
    Mild 0 - - - - -
    Mild to moderate 4 56 / 1013 51 / 841 1.08 (0.73, 1.60) 0.65 0%
    Moderate to severe 4 77 / 670 91 / 656 0.79 (0.56, 1.12) 0.55 0%
    Severe 1 15 / 203 14 / 201 1.07 (0.50, 2.27) - -

Residential status (P for interaction = 0.868)
    Community 8 102 / 1753 109 / 1566 0.91 (0.69, 1.21) 0.63 0%
    Nursing home 1 46 / 133 47 / 132 0.96 (0.58, 1.58) - -

Length of follow-up (P for interaction = 0.580)
    < 6 months 1 2 / 17 1 / 17 2.13 (0.18, 26.0) - -
    6 – 11 months 8 146 / 1869 155 / 1681 0.91 (0.71, 1.17) 0.68 0%
    12 – 17 months 4 43 / 865 37 / 837 1.18 (0.64, 2.15) 0.20 36%
    ≥ 18 months 0 - - - - -

Syncope
Type of cognitive impairment (P for interaction = N/A)
    AD 4 8 / 854 7 / 841 1.04 (0.35, 3.04) 0.44 0%
    VD or mixed dementia 0 - - - - -
    PDD or DLB 0 - - - - -
    MCI 0 - - - - -

Severity of cognitive impairment (P for interaction = 0.968)
    Mild 0 - - - - -
    Mild to moderate 1 2 / 201 2 / 202 1.00 (0.14, 7.19) - -
    Moderate to severe 3 6 / 653 5 / 639 1.07 (0.21, 5.40) 0.23 27%
    Severe 0 - - - - -

Residential status (P for interaction = 0.251)
    Community 3 8 / 721 5 / 709 1.32 (0.42, 4.16) 0.49 0%
    Nursing home 1 0 / 133 2 / 132 0.20 (0.01, 4.11) - -

Length of follow-up (P for interaction = 0.963)
    < 6 months 0 - - - - -
    6 – 11 months 4 8 / 854 7 / 841 1.04 (0.35, 3.04) 0.44 0%
    12 – 17 months 4 6 / 865 5 / 837 1.08 (0.34, 3.38) 0.75 0%
    ≥ 18 months 0 - - - - -

Fracture
Type of cognitive impairment (P for interaction = N/A)
    AD 3 2 / 492 11 / 484 0.21 (0.05, 0.85) 0.90 0%
    VD or mixed dementia 0 - - - - -
    PDD or DLB 0 - - - - -
    MCI 0 - - - - -

Severity of cognitive impairment (P for interaction = N/A)
    Mild 0 - - - - -
    Mild to moderate 0 - - - - -
    Moderate to severe 3 2 / 492 11 / 484 0.21 (0.05, 0.85) 0.90 0%
    Severe 0 - - - - -

Residential status (P for interaction = 0.726)
    Community 2 1 / 359 5 / 352 0.26 (0.04, 1.65) 0.76 0%
    Nursing home 1 1 / 133 6 / 132 0.16 (0.02, 1.34) - -

Length of follow-up (P for interaction = 0.053)
    < 6 months 1 0 / 17 2 / 17 0.18 (0.01, 3.98) - -
    6 – 11 months 2 2 / 475 9 / 467 0.22 (0.05, 1.05) 0.65 0%
    12 – 17 months 1 7 / 246 3 / 245 2.36 (0.60, 9.25) - -
    ≥ 18 months 0 - - - - -

Accidental Injury
Type of cognitive impairment (P for interaction = 0.152)
    AD 6 58 / 1459 58 / 1278 0.93 (0.63, 1.37) 0.54 0%
    VD or mixed dementia 1 17 / 277 30 / 271 0.53 (0.28, 0.98) - -
    PDD or DLB 0 - - - - -
    MCI 0 - - - - -

Severity of cognitive impairment (P for interaction = 0.784)
    Mild 0 - - - - -
    Mild to moderate 4 54 / 1013 57 / 841 0.94 (0.52, 1.71) 0.14 46%
    Moderate to severe 2 11 / 520 15 / 507 0.70 (0.31, 1.56) 0.76 0%
    Severe 1 10 / 203 16 / 201 0.60 (0.27, 1.35) - -

Residential status (P for interaction = N/A)
    Community 7 75 / 1736 88 / 1549 0.80 (0.56, 1.12) 0.38 6%
    Nursing home 0 - - - - -

Length of follow-up (P for interaction = 0.949)
    < 6 months 0 - - - - -
    6 – 11 months 7 75 / 1736 88 / 1549 0.80 (0.56, 1.12) 0.38 6%
    12 – 17 months 4 28 / 714 34 / 672 0.78 (0.46, 1.30) 0.81 0%
    ≥ 18 months 0 - - - - -

Abbreviations: AD, Alzheimer's disease; CI, confidence interval; DLB, dementia with Lewy body; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; N/A, non-applicable; OR, odds ratio; PDD, Parkinson disease with dementia; VD, vascular dementia.

*

P value for interaction was computed from the meta-regression model that investigated the variations in effect size by a study-level characteristic.

I2 measures the proportion of heterogeneity in individual studies that cannot be explained by chance.

Open-label extension studies of placebo-controlled trials were included so that the number of studies may be greater.