Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 18.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Topogr. 2009 Oct 28;22(4):219–232. doi: 10.1007/s10548-009-0115-4

Table 2.

Quantified EEG changes after repeated TMS pulses

Authors Subjects TMS-parameters EEG-measures Timing of EEG Aftereffects Duration of aftereffects
Urushihara et al. (2006) N = 9 healthy 0.2 Hz/21 min of monophasic M1,PM,SMA/85%rMT/250p SEP-amplitude Before and after TMS Yes: ~55% facilitation after PM-stim Not assessed
Hosono et al. (2008) N = 13 healthy 0.2 Hz/20 min/mono- vs. biphasic PM,sham/85%rMT/250p SEP-amplitude Before and after TMS Yes: ~30–40% facilitation for mono-but no effect for bi-phasic At least 10 min but recovered after 30 min
Van Der Werf and Paus (2006) N = 12 0.6 Hz/15 min M1,PM/90%rMT/540p TMS-induced response Before and after TMS Yes: ~60% amplitude decrease, reduction in induced activity (theta) At least 40 min not studied longer
Satow et al. (2003) N = 8 healthy 0.9 Hz/16.6 min S1/90%rMT/900p SEP-amplitude Before and after rTMS No n.a.
Rollnik et al. (2004) N = 11 healty 0.9 Hz/15–20 × 60 s trains frontal/90%MT Error-related negativity After TMS Yes: attenuation of ERN At least 3 min not studied longer
Chen et al. (2003) N = 8 healthy 0.9 Hz/15 min PM/90%aMT/818p Movement-related power/coherence (task) Before and after TMS Yes: less task-related alpha/beta decrease coherence increase (alpha) Up to 15 min recovered after 30 min
Enomoto et al. (2001) N = 7 healthy 1 Hz/3.3 min PM, M1,S1/110%aMT/200p SEP-amplitude Before and after rTMS Yes: ~40% suppression with M1 but not PM or S1 Up to 60 min recovered after 70 min
Restuccia et al. (2007) N = 8 healthy 1 Hz/20 min S1/sham/80%MT/1200p Early/late HF-SEPs Before and after TMS Yes: ~18/26% facilit./suppress. after S1 relative to sham Up to 15 min recovered after 20 min
Bohotin et al. (2002) N = 24 healthy 1 Hz/15 min occipital/100%PT/900p VEP-amplitude & habituation Before and after TMS Yes: ~15% suppression in controls Up to 15–30 min
Fumal et al. (2003) N = 24 healthy 1 Hz/15 min occipital/100%PT/900p VEP-amplitude & habituation Before and after TMS Yes: ~15% suppression Up to 33 min recovery after 40 min
Schutter and van Honk (2003) N = 8 healthy 1 Hz/20 min occipital/110%MT/1200p VEP-amplitude After TMS and sham Yes: ~55% suppression Not assessed
Thut et al. (2003) N = 6 healthy 1 Hz/10 min Occipital/110%PT/600p VEP-amplitude alpha-changes Before and after TMS Yes: ~40% suppression of desynchronization (alpha) At least 8 min recovered after 20 min
Evers et al. (2001) N = 14 healthy 1 Hz/2 min DLPFC/95%MT/120p Visual P300 Before and after TMS No n.a.
Hansenne et al. (2004) N = 17 healthy 1 Hz/10 and 15 min DLPFC/100%MT/600–900p Auditory P300 Before and after TMS Yes/No: latency increase after 15 min but not 10 min rTMS Not assessed
Rossi et al. (2000) N = 5 healthy 1 Hz/15 min M1/110%MT/900p Readiness potential After TMS and Sham Yes: ~30% focal amplitude decrease Not assessed
Strens et al. (2002) N = 15 healthy 1 Hz/25 min M1/90%aMT/1500p Spectral power coherence (rest and task) Before and after TMS Yes: ~15% focal increase in coherence (alpha) Up to 25 min recovered after 30 min
Tamura et al. (2005) N = 12 healthy 1 Hz/10 min M1/95%rMT/600p Movement-related oscillations Control and after TMS Yes: ~10% decrease in synchronization (beta) Not assessed
Brignani et al. (2008) N = 6 healthy 1 Hz/10 min M1/110%MT/600p EEG power (rest) During TMS Yes: max 82% focal, cumulative increase in power (alpha) Not assessed
Pastor et al. (2006) N = 6 healthy 1 Hz/10 min Cerebellum/60%max/600p Steady-state potentials Before and after TMS Yes: change in prefrontal oscillations (gamma) At least 7.5 min not studied longer
Schutter et al. (2001) N = 12 healthy 1 Hz/20 min DLPFC/130%MT/1200p Spectral power (rest) After TMS and sham Yes: increase in prefrontal power (theta) At least 1 h not studied longer
Ragert et al. (2004) N = 13 healthy 5 Hz/5 × 5 × 10 s: 5 s ITI S1/90%MT1250p Paired pulse SEP-inhibition Before and after TMS Yes: suppression of inhibition with ipsil-vs. contralateral S1 At least 1h not studied longer
Holler et al. (2006) N = 8 healthy 5 Hz/5 × 60 s train: 60 s ITI M1/90%rMT/1500p Anticipatory CNV Before and after TMS/sham Yes: focal amplitude increase Not assessed
Oliviero et al. (2003) N = 16 healthy 5 Hz/10 s single train M1/100%aMT/50p Spectral power coherence (rest and task) Before and after TMS Yes: ~25% focal coherence decrease (alpha) Immediately after TMS recovered after 25 min
Fuggetta et al. (2008) N = 11 healthy 5 Hz/20 × 4 s trains: 30 s ITI M1/80–100%MT/400p EEG power and coherence (rest) During TMS Yes: ~30–40% focal incr/decr in alpha and beta power/coherence Not assessed
Huber et al. (2007) N = 10 healthy 5 Hz/5 × 6 × 10 s train: 5 s ITI M1/90%rMT/1500p Sleep EEG After TMS and sham Yes: ~40% local increase in slow wave activity Up to 30 min of nREM recovered after 31 min
Esser et al. (2006) N = 7 healthy 5 Hz/5 × 6 × 10 s train: 5 s ITI M1/90%rMT/1500p TMS-induced response Before and after rTMS Yes: ~60% amplitude increase At least 10 min not studied longer
Restuccia et al. (2007) N = 8 healthy 10 Hz/12 × 10 s trains: 20 s ITI S1/sham/80%MT/1200p Early/late HF-SEPs Before and after TMS Yes: ~–/14% –/facilit. after S1 relative to sham At least 20 min
Bohotin et al. (2002) N = 30 Migraine 10 Hz/18 × 5 s trains: 10 s ITI occipital/100%PT/900p VEP-amplitude & habituation Before and after TMS Yes: ~15% facilitation in migraineurs Up to 9–30 min
Jing et al. (2001b) N = 15 healthy 10 Hz/2 × 3 s train: 5 min ITI DLPFC/100%MT/60p Auditory P300 Before and after TMS Yes: ~15–25% decrease in N100-amplitude, changes in P200/P300-latencies Not assessed
Jing et al. (2001a) N = 29 healthy 10 Hz/2 × 3 s train: 5 min ITI DLPFC/100%MT/60p Auditory P300 Before and after TMS Yes: latency-increase Not assessed
Griskova et al. (2007) N = 18 healthy 10 Hz/100 × 2 s train: 10 s ITI DLPFC/110%MT/2000p Spectral power (rest) Before and after TMS Yes: ~400% increase in delta-power At least 10 min, not studied longer
Okamura et al. (2001) N = 32 healthy 10 Hz/2 × 3 s train: 300 s ITI Frontal/100%MT/60p Spectral power (rest) Before and after TMS Yes: change in peak frequency and power (~10%, many frequencies) At least 5 min not studied longer
Jing and Takigawa (2000) N = 19 healthy 10 Hz/2 × 3 s train: 5 min ITI DLPFC/100%MT/60p Coherence (rest) Before and after TMS Yes: max 32% focal directed coherence increase (alpha) At least 5 min not studied longer
Klimesch et al. (2003) N = 16 healthy High frequency/IAF-20 Hz 1.2–4.8 s trains: >12 s ITI parietal,frontal/110%MT/24p Band power and event-related desynchronization Before and after TMS Yes: ~40% increase of desynchronization (alpha) Not assessed
Evers et al. (2001) N = 14 healthy 20 Hz/3 × 5 s train: 1 min ITI DLPFC/95%MT/300p Visual P300 Before and after TMS Yes: latency-decrease Not assessed
Graf et al. (2001) N = 8 healthy 20 Hz/40 × 2 s train: 28 s ITI DLPFC/90%MT/1600p Sleep EEG Before and after TMS Yes: minor reduction in sleep stage 1 Not assessed
Cohrs et al. (1998) N = 13 healthy 20 Hz/160 × 0.25 s: 8 s ITI DLPFC/120%rMT/800p Sleep EEG After TMS and sham Yes: delay in REM-latency prolonged nREM-REM cycle Not assessed
Schutter et al. (2003) N = 5 healthy 25 Hz/80 × 10 s train: 5 s ITI Cerebellum/80%MT/2000p Spectral power (rest) Before and after TMS Yes: change in prefrontal asymmetry (gamma) At least 15 min not studied longer
Ishikawa et al. (2007) N = 12 healthy cThetaBS/40 s M1,S1/80%aMT/600p SEP-amplitude Before and after TMS Yes: ~20% suppression with S1 vs. ~50% facilitation with M1 Up to 53 min recovered after 60 min
Sağlam et al. (2008) N = 8 healthy cThetaBS/40 s M1,S1/80%aMT/600p EEG-EMG-coherence Before and after TMS Yes: ~50% suppression with M1 but not S1 Up to 30–60 min recovered after 90 min
Schindler et al. (2008) N = 4 healthy cThetaBS/33 s right FEF/80%rMT/600p Spectral analysis (rest) Before and after TMS Yes: ~enhanced synchronization in stimulated hemisphere At least 60 min not studied longer
Ortu et al. (2009) N = 7 healthy cThetaBS/40 s M1,PM/80%aMT/600p Readiness potential Before and after TMS Yes: ~30–50% suppression with left M1 but nor right M1 nor PM At least 30 min not studied longer
Grossheinrich et al. (2009) N = 12 healthy cThetaBS/40 s DLPFC,mPFC/80%rMT/600p imThetaBS as sham Spectral analysis (rest) Before and after TMS No n.a.
iThetaBS/20 × 2 s: 8 s ITI imThetaBS as sham Spectral analysis Before and after TMS Yes: alpha-power enhancement after DLPFC Up to 50 min not studied longer
Poreisz et al. (2008) N = 12 healthy cThetaBS/40 s S1,Sham/80%aMT/600p Laser-evoked potential Before and after TMS Yes: ~15% suppression of N2 Up to 8–10 min not studied longer
iThetaBS/20 × 2 s: 8 s ITI S1,Sham/80%aMT/600p Laser-evoked potential Before and after TMS Yes: ~20% suppression of N2 Up to 8–10 min not studied longer
imThetaBS/8 × 5 s: 10 s ITI S1,Sham/80%aMT/600p Laser-evoked potential Before and after TMS Yes: ~25% suppression of N2 Up to 8–10 min not studied longer
Katayama and Rothwell (2007) N = 11 healthy iThetaBS/19 × 2 s: 8 s ITI M1,S1/80%aMT/600p SEP-amplitude Before and after TMS Yes: ~10–20% facilitation with S1 but not M1 Up to 30 min not studied longer
Tsuji and Rothwell (2002) N = 9 healthy PAS, 30 min M1/105%rMT/180p SEP-amplitude Before and after TMS Yes: ~40–60% facilitation Up to 10 min recovered after 20 min
Wolters et al. (2005) N = 64 healthy PAS, 30 min M1,S1/150%rMT/180p SEP-amplitude Before and after TMS Yes: ~15–20% facilitation with S1 but not M1 Up to 30 min recovered after 60 min
Huber et al. (2008) N = 19 healthy PAS, 22.5 min M1/130%rMT/90p TMS-induced response Before and after TMS Yes: ~10% facilitation or 10% inhibition depending on ISI At least 2 min not studied longer
Slow wave activity (sleep) After TMS Yes: correlation with change in TMS-induced response At least 90 min not studied longer

Studies ordered according to protocols and EEG-measure

TMS-parameters: iThetaBS: intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation; cThetaBS: continuous Theta Burst Stimulation, PAS: repeated paired associative stimulation; ITI: inter-train interval; aMT: active motor threshold; rMT: resting motor threshold; PT: phosphene threshold; p: pulses; IAF: individual alpha frequency; Stimulation sites DLPFC: dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, PM: premotor; EEG-measures SEP: somatosensory evoked potential; HF-SEP: high-frequency SEPs