Table 3.
Global variation in collectivism from the global leadership and organizational behaviour effectiveness research project [23].
| country | collectivisma | clusterb |
|---|---|---|
| Philippines | 6.36 | A |
| Georgia | 6.19 | A |
| Iran | 6.03 | A |
| India | 5.92 | A |
| Turkey | 5.88 | A |
| Morocco | 5.87 | A |
| Zambia | 5.84 | A |
| Ecuador | 5.81 | A |
| China | 5.80 | A |
| Kuwait | 5.80 | A |
| Albania | 5.74 | A |
| Colombia | 5.73 | A |
| Mexico | 5.71 | A |
| Thailand | 5.70 | A |
| Indonesia | 5.68 | A |
| Egypt | 5.64 | A |
| Singapore | 5.64 | A |
| Guatemala | 5.63 | A |
| Russia | 5.63 | A |
| Taiwan | 5.59 | A |
| Zimbabwe | 5.57 | A |
| Nigeria | 5.55 | A |
| South Korea | 5.54 | A |
| Venezuela | 5.53 | A |
| Poland | 5.52 | A |
| Malaysia | 5.51 | A |
| Portugal | 5.51 | A |
| Argentina | 5.51 | A |
| Bolivia | 5.47 | A |
| Spain | 5.45 | A |
| Slovenia | 5.43 | A |
| El Salvador | 5.35 | A |
| Costa Rica | 5.32 | B |
| Hong Kong | 5.32 | B |
| Greece | 5.27 | B |
| Kazakhstan | 5.26 | B |
| Hungary | 5.25 | B |
| Brazil | 5.18 | B |
| Ireland | 5.14 | B |
| South Africa (Black sample) | 5.09 | B |
| Italy | 4.94 | B |
| Austria | 4.85 | B |
| Qatar | 4.71 | B |
| Israel | 4.70 | B |
| Japan | 4.63 | B |
| Namibia | 4.52 | B |
| Germany (former German Democratic Republic (GDR)-East) | 4.52 | B |
| South Africa (White sample) | 4.50 | B |
| France | 4.37 | B |
| Canada (English-speaking) | 4.26 | C |
| USA | 4.25 | C |
| Australia | 4.17 | C |
| England | 4.08 | C |
| Finland | 4.07 | C |
| Germany (former Federal Republic of Germany (FRG)-West) | 4.02 | C |
| Switzerland | 3.97 | C |
| French Switzerland | 3.85 | C |
| Netherlands | 3.70 | C |
| New Zealand | 3.67 | C |
| Sweden | 3.66 | C |
| Denmark | 3.53 | C |
aHigher scores indicate more collectivism (GLOBE ingroup collectivism, practice scale). Countries are ranked according to mean scores.
bClusters are calculated according to the formula 2 × SED (standard error of difference), where SED is a function of the reliability of the scale of interest (see House et al. [24] for more information).