Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 23;31(47):16907–16915. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2737-11.2011

Table 2.

Summary of results using the PI as a regressor to predict FC

ROI pcorr Z value MNI coordinate
Z value day 1 Z value day 2 Cluster's anatomical label
x y z
SII 0.01 4.2 −30 −18 48 −0.06 4.47 L BA4, primary motor cortex
3.95 −26 −12 46 1.8 4.11 L BA6, ventral premotor cortex
3.8 −42 −12 56 1.54 3.62 L BA6, premotor cortex
SMA 0.002 4.39 −62 −16 12 4.6 7.4 L SII, OP1
3.4 −58 −20 20 3.3 5.2 L SII, OP1
PMv 0.0000 6.1 −62 −18 16 0.04 4.65 L SII, OP1
4.2 −56 −18 28 4.2 6.35 L inferior parietal lobule
CB 0.0007 4.08 −8 −84 50 −0.1 −3.7 L superior parietal lobule
4.02 36 −80 24 −1.2 −2.9 R inferior parietal lobule
0.0001 4.39 −10 66 16 0.45 3.8 L SFG, BA 10

The table shows clusters whose correlation with the corresponding ROI changed reliably with motor learning. pcorr is the corrected cluster-level p value related to the regressor of interest (PI). The associated Z score for the peak is shown in the Z value column. Z value day1 and Z value day 2 give Z scores at the location of maximum activation based on values averaged over subjects on days 1 and 2, respectively. A negative Z score indicates an anti-correlation between the ROI time series and the time series of activation peak. L, Left; R, right; SFG, superior frontal gyrus.