Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 5;26(2):350–356. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1874-z

Table 1.

Framework to which observations are categorized

Risk domain Influencing factor Observation (quantity)
Input
Surgical team Knowledge and experience of individual team member Experience of every individual team member defined as the estimated number of similar procedures previously performed
Social interaction Verbal and nonverbal communication Events concerning verbal miscommunication
Teamwork Events concerning teamwork
Technology Availability and functioning of equipment and instruments Events concerning the presence or correct positioning of instruments or equipment
Events concerning the functioning of instruments or equipment
Organization Staffing and planning Adequate scheduling
Adequate staffing
Availability of recourses Availability of supplies
Availability of technological items
Safeguarding system Compliance of policies adapted for patient safety Correct execution of the time-out procedure
Environment Case-irrelevant disturbing factors Door movements
Telephone calls
Pager calls
Radio use
Case-irrelevant conversation
Patient characteristics Condition of the patient ASA score
BMI
Complexity of surgery Difficulty level of the surgery MIS: type of procedure that can be categorized in RCOG levels
CS: type of procedure
Output
Performed procedure Was the procedure performed as intended?
Intraoperative complication Did intraoperative complications occur?
Postoperative complication Postoperative complications up to 6 weeks afterward
Blood loss Amount of blood loss
Procedure time Total observational and intraoperative procedure time

ASA American society of anesthesiologists; BMI body mass index; MIS minimally invasive surgery; RCOG Royal college of obstetricians and gynecologists; CS conventional surgery