Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov;59(11):1022–1030. doi: 10.1369/0022155411424606

Table 5.

Comparison of Claudin Protein, mRNA, and Ki-67 Protein Expression in Control Samples and UCCs

CT vs ICT CT vs UCC ICT vs UCC LG vs HGa LG vs HGb
CLDN-1 IHC ↑(0.386) ↓(0.014) ↓(0.001) ↓(0.078) ↓(0.035)
CLDN-2 IHC ↑(0.007) ↑(0.489) ↓(0.001) ↑(0.913) ↑(0.337)
CLDN-4 IHC ↑(0.039) ↑(0.125) ↓(0.082) ↑(0.037) ↑(0.011)
CLDN-7 IHC ↑(0.791) ↑(0.115) ↓(0.062) ↓(<0.001) ↓(0.001)
CLDN-1 mRNA ↓(0.624) ↑(0.101) ↑(0.117) ↓(0.025) ↓(0.017)
CLDN-2 mRNA ↑(0.624) ↑(0.037) ↑(0.727) ↑(0.002) ↑(0.009)
CLDN-4 mRNA ↓(0.624) ↑(0.092) ↑(0.034) ↑(<0.001) ↑(<0.001)
CLDN-7 mRNA ↑(0.047) ↑(0.001) ↑(0.043) ↓(0.720) ↓(0.819)
Ki-67 ↓(0.245) ↑(0.076) ↑(0.196) ↑(<0.001) ↑(<0.001)

IHC, immunohistochemistry; CT, non-inflamed control samples; ICT, inflamed control samples; LG, low grade; HG, high grade; UCC, urothelial cell cancer. Significant changes are marked in bold; p-values are in parentheses. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to calculate statistics between two independent groups (TaT1 vs T2; LG vs HG). The non-underlined group is compared to the underlined one (reference). ↑ groups not underlined show higher expression compared with the reference group. ↓ groups not underlined show decreased expression compared with the reference group.

a

Including T2.

b

Without T2.