Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 19;8(1):e1002359. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002359

Table 4. Estimated in vivo % residual DNA-dependent polymerization Inline graphic for distinct mutants and drug combinations.

wt Q151M M184V K65R M184V/K65R
TFV-DP 4.16–24.11 9.20–42.55 3.32–20.05 19.11–63.34 8.72–41.14
AZT-TP 29.47–80.69 - - - -
d4T-TP 2.08–25.95 - 7.44–56.97 - -
FTC-TP 2.07–21.45 1.24–14.00 - 21.28–77.76 47.37–92.09
3TC-TP 1.54–4.95 0.86–2.81 51.22–77.71 12.29–31.77 86.19–95.40
CBV-TP 7.63–14.18 82.27–90.27 45.49–62.53 - -
FTC-TP 1.39–12.69 1.11–11.75 - 11.02–53.12 7.80–39.22
+TFV-DP
d4T-TP 0.91–4.40 - 7.01–49.20 -
+3TC-TP
CBV-TP 1.33–3.89 0.87–2.84 32.20–53.53 - -
+3TC-TP
CBV-TP 1.27–3.81 - - - -
+3TC-TP
+AZT-TP
fitness 100 100 46 38 30

In vivo concentration ranges were 3TC-TP = 12.2–40.5; FTC-TP = 1.5–19.4; TFV-DP = 0.16–1.17; CBV-TP = 0.44–0.88; d4T-TP = 0.034–0.56; and AZT-TP = 0.0056–0.056 Inline graphic respectively [56], [71], [73][75], assuming an average cell volume of Inline graphic for resting Inline graphic T-cells [72].