Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 1;120(1):50–55. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1103448

Table 1.

Characteristics of the study population as a whole and of the subsamples of subjects with and without self-reported physician-diagnosed hypertension.a

Total study (n = 6,450) Stratum by hypertensiona
Characteristic No (n = 5,336) Yes (n = 1,073) p-Valueb
Sociodemographic characteristics
Sex (%)
Male 48.9 47.8 54.1
Female 51.1 52.3 46.0 < 0.0001
Age (mean ± SD) 52.0 ± 11.5 50.5 ± 11.3 60.3 ± 8.5 < 0.0001
Marital status (%)
Married/widowed 74.0 72.6 80.9
Divorced 9.0 9.2 8.5
Single 16.0 17.2 10.1 < 0.0001
Educational levelc (%)
Low 22.8 21.7 28.7
Medium 59.6 60.4 55.3
High 17.6 17.9 15.8 < 0.0001
Full-time employment (%) 48.0 50.6 34.2 < 0.0001
Lifestyle characteristics
Smoking (%)
Never 43.4 44.4 38.8 < 0.0001
Former 31.6 30.0 39.7
Current 24.9 25.5 21.5
BMI (mean ± SD) 25.9 ± 4.4 25.3 ± 4.1 28.7 ± 4.6 < 0.0001
Alcohol use (%)
Seldom/never 30.8 30.8 30.8
Weekly 44.6 46.3 35.6
Daily 24.7 22.9 33.6 < 0.0001
Health status characteristics
Blood pressure (mmHg) (mean ± SD)
SBP 127 ± 19.5 123 ± 18 142 ± 20 < 0.0001
DBP 80 ± 11.0 78 ± 10.5 89.9 ± 11 < 0.0001
Antihypertensive medication (%) 11.3 4.0 47.7 < 0.0001
Pulse [counts/min (mean ± SD)] 70 ± 10.5 70 ± 10 71 ± 12 0.273
Cholesterol [mmol/L (mean ± SD)] 6.03 ± 1.3 6.01 ± 1.2 6.12 ± 1.5 0.008
Diabetesa (%) 3.0 1.6 10.0 < 0.0001
CVDa (%) 7.7 53 19.9 < 0.0001
Hearing deficita (%) 5.8 4.9 10.3 < 0.0001
Self-reported noise exposure
Noise exposure at workd (%) 13.9 13.9 14.3 0.937
Noise annoyancee (%) 10.1 10.6 10.2 0.605
aSelf-reported physician diagnosis. bDifference between strata. cBased on highest degree of schooling: low, primary school; medium, secondary school; high, technical schools or university. dSubjects answering “noise” to the question “Which substances were you working with during the last 3 years?” eHigh noise annoyance corresponds to > 6 on an 11-point scale asking for annoyance by traffic at home when windows are open.