Table 3.
Estimates for the associations between natural log of urinary BPA concentrations and gene expression intensity (log transformed), in age-adjusted and fully adjusteda regression models.
| Age-adjusted model | Fully adjusted model | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene | Coefficient (95% CI) | p-Value | Std β | Coefficient (95% CI) | p-Value | Std β | ||||||
| ESR1 | –0.0657 (–0.1815, 0.0500) | 0.262 | –0.117 | –0.1071 (–0.2205, 0.0063) | 0.064 | –0.1909 | ||||||
| ESR2 | 0.1804 (0.0388, 0.3221) | 0.013 | 0.231 | 0.1387 (0.001, 0.2764) | 0.048 | 0.1775 | ||||||
| ESRRA | 0.1718 (0.0213, 0.3223) | 0.026 | 0.250 | 0.1886 (0.0324, 0.3448) | 0.019 | 0.2699 | ||||||
| ESRRB | –0.2816 (–1.3969, 0.8337) | 0.617 | –0.054 | –0.4857 (–1.6669, 0.6955) | 0.416 | –0.0925 | ||||||
| ESRRG | ND | ND | ||||||||||
| AR | 0.0115 (–0.1404, 0.1634) | 0.881 | 0.016 | 0.0925 (–0.0646, 0.2495) | 0.245 | 0.1285 | ||||||
| Abbreviations: ND, not detected; Std, standardized. aFull adjustment included age, BMI, study site, educational attainment, and LDL cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations, plus percentages of neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, and eosinophils. | ||||||||||||