Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Chem. 2011 Dec 29;55(1):367–377. doi: 10.1021/jm201251c

Table 3.

Cytotoxicities of Quinoline and Pyrroloquinoline Ammosamide Analogues in Cancer Cell Lines at 10 μM Concentration

compd Growth Percenta
Meanb lung HOP-62 colon HCT-116 CNS SF-539 melanoma UACC-62 ovarian OVCAR-3 renal SN12C prostate DU-145 breast MCF7
2 101.07 96.95 101.05 88.22 100.09 115.24 98.89 114.59 98.04
10 105.27 108.99 108.20 117.31 101.70 106.32 102.78 108.11 105.75
11 104.88 104.53 100.36 99.06 97.93 109.55 99.49 108.85 100.27
12 104.38 109.87 98.84 104.82 102.96 110.07 102.63 105.75 97.23
13 109.97 112.21 103.44 109.23 112.51 124.69 109.64 112.18 100.11
14 103.06 103.41 104.18 107.48 108.54 120.20 109.00 124.60 89.58
15 104.52 114.23 104.18 100.61 109.82 115.27 113.39 138.91 78.61
30 103.35 105.32 107.00 104.34 90.84 108.21 101.49 97.82 96.11
31 104.17 113.20 103.06 97.49 101.93 103.52 107.48 104.81 95.79
32 108.57 118.26 102.47 101.43 110.63 126.09 106.07 127.34 122.71
34 105.39 110.60 104.56 106.99 96.96 123.43 102.66 112.19 94.99
a

Growth percent relative to control (untreated cell cultures).

b

Mean growth percent in the NCI panel of 60 human cancer cell lines.