Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Metabolism. 2011 Oct 13;61(4):554–561. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2011.09.003

Table 2.

Linear Model Results of Uric Acid*

Model Covariate Estimate 95% CI p-value
Education**
 Less than High School 0.02 (−0.18, 0.13) 0.78
 High School 0.02 (−0.12, 0.16) 0.78
Added Sugar (Percent of Total Calories) 0.005 (−0.001, 0.011) 0.13
Income-to-Needs Ratio 0.03 (−0.01, 0.06) 0.20
Current Smoker 0.13 (−0.06, 0.32) 0.17
Females (vs. Males) −1.10 (−1.24, −0.96) < 0.01
Race/Ethnicity
 Hispanic −0.06 (−0.22, 0.11) 0.51
 Non-Hispanic Black −0.37 (−0.52, −0.23) < 0.01
MetS vs. No MetS – Females
 Non-Hispanic White 0.64 (0.31, 0.96) < 0.01
 Hispanic 1.38 (0.48, 2.29) < 0.01
 Non-Hispanic Black 1.14 (0.59, 1.69) < 0.01
MetS vs. No MetS – Males
 Non-Hispanic White 1.42 (0.88, 1.96) < 0.01
 Hispanic 0.88 (0.47, 1.29) < 0.01
 Non-Hispanic Black 1.03 (0.66, 1.40) < 0.01
*

Final model included three-way interaction among MetS, gender, and ethnicity (interaction p-value = 0.0495); model R2 = 0.321. Intercept 5.44 (95% CI 5.22–5.67).

**

Highest among household (person who owns/rents house or his/her spouse), values indicate differences from “more than high school” category

Values indicate difference from Non-Hispanic White