Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Psychiatry. 2011 Sep 2;169(1):31–38. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11020320

TABLE 5.

Probability of Use and Expenditures on Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services for Childrena

Plans Probability of Use of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services Total Mental Health and Substance Abuse Spending per Benefciary Change in Value before and after the Implementation of Parity
Pre-parity Post-parity Pre-parity Post-parity Probability of Use of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services Total Mental Health and Substance Abuse Spending per Beneficiary
Percent $ Percent (95% CI) $ (95% CI)
Self Insured Comparison Plans (N=4,870) 10.84 12.93 152.28 214.53 NA NA
Plan A (N=8,405) 11.82 13.65 162.63 256.42 −0.28 (1.21, −0.71) 36.62 (−13.43, 96.07)
Plan B (N=4,705) 11.00 13.69 152.65 252.66 0.46 (−0.83, 1.43) 32.44 (−31.94, 106.59)
Plan C (N=6,720) 11.27 13.78 124.16 207.02 0.32 (−0.70, 1.35) 15.25 (−38.23, 62.99)
Plan D (N=4,249) 9.90 11.48 105.81 192.25 −0.48 (−1.39, 0.66) 22.54 (−46.89, 112.15)
a

CI denotes confidence interval.

b

Pre-parity and post-parity figures are annual figures averaged across two years

c

A difference-in-differences analysis was used to account for secular trends.

d

P≤0.05