Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan;58(1):e22–e31.

Table 2.

Multivariate analysis of the effect of age, income, and region on receiving Papanicolaou screening and follow-up of low-grade lesions or unsatisfactory results

VARIABLE PAP TEST
FOLLOW-UP AFTER A LOW-GRADE LESION ON PAP TEST
FOLLOW-UP AFTER AN UNSATISFACTORY PAP TEST RESULT
OR (95% CI) P VALUE OR (95% CI) P VALUE OR (95% CI) P VALUE
Age, y < .001 < .001 < .001
  • < 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
  • 25–44 1.52 (1.51–1.53) 1.19 (1.14–1.24) 1.28 (0.98–1.67)
  • 45–70 1.02 (1.02–1.03) 1.13 (1.07–1.19) 0.77 (0.59–0.99)
Income quintile < .001 < .001 .118
  • 1 (lowest) 0.56 (0.55–0.56) 0.85 (0.80–0.90) 0.99 (0.77–1.27)
  • 2 0.67 (0.67–0.67) 0.88 (0.83–0.94) 0.82 (0.64–1.05)
  • 3 0.77 (0.77–0.78) 0.94 (0.89–1.00) 0.93 (0.74–1.16)
  • 4 0.89 (0.88–0.90) 0.97 (0.92–1.03) 0.77 (0.62–0.96)
  • 5 (highest) 1.00 1.00 1.00
LHIN < .001 < .001 .295
  • Erie St Clair 1.00 1.00 1.00
  • South West 1.17 (1.16–1.19) 0.57 (0.52–0.63) 1.21 (0.74–1.98)
  • Waterloo Wellington 1.25 (1.24–1.27) 0.60 (0.54–0.66) 1.12 (0.66–1.88)
  • Hamilton Niagara Haldimand Brant 1.12 (1.11–1.13) 0.61 (0.56–0.67) 1.15 (0.73–1.81)
  • Central West 1.04 (1.03–1.05) 0.60 (0.54–0.67) 0.70 (0.40–1.24)
  • Mississauga Halton 1.12 (1.10–1.13) 0.74 (0.67–0.82) 1.16 (0.71–1.90)
  • Toronto Central 1.15 (1.14–1.17) 0.95 (0.87–1.05) 1.43 (0.89–2.31)
  • Central 1.20 (1.19–1.21) 0.87 (0.79–0.95) 1.20 (0.76–1.89)
  • Central East 1.22 (1.21–1.24) 0.74 (0.68–0.81) 1.01 (0.63–1.62)
  • South East 1.31 (1.29–1.33) 0.42 (0.37–0.47) 1.01 (0.59–1.73)
  • Champlain 1.38 (1.36–1.40) 0.78 (0.71–0.85) 1.08 (0.68–1.72)
  • North Simcoe Muskoka 1.13 (1.11–1.15) 0.78 (0.69–0.89) 1.51 (0.88–2.57)
  • North East 1.10 (1.08–1.11) 0.57 (0.51–0.63) 1.40 (0.83–2.35)
  • North West 1.07 (1.05–1.09) 0.75 (0.66–0.86) 1.19 (0.66–2.16)

LHIN—Local Health Integration Network, OR—odds ratio.