Abstract
Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) leader proteinase (Lpro) cleaves itself from the viral polyprotein and cleaves the translation initiation factor eIF4G. As a result, host cell translation is inhibited, affecting the host innate immune response. We have demonstrated that Lpro is also associated with degradation of nuclear factor κB (NF-κB), a process that requires Lpro nuclear localization. Additionally, we reported that disruption of a conserved protein domain within the Lpro coding sequence, SAP mutation, prevented Lpro nuclear retention and degradation of NF-κB, resulting in in vitro attenuation. Here we report that inoculation of swine with this SAP-mutant virus does not cause clinical signs of disease, viremia, or virus shedding even when inoculated at doses 100-fold higher than those required to cause disease with wild-type (WT) virus. Remarkably, SAP-mutant virus-inoculated animals developed a strong neutralizing antibody response and were completely protected against challenge with WT FMDV as early as 2 days postinoculation and for at least 21 days postinoculation. Early protection correlated with a distinct pattern in the serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines in comparison to the levels detected in animals inoculated with WT FMDV that developed disease. In addition, animals inoculated with the FMDV SAP mutant displayed a memory T cell response that resembled infection with WT virus. Our results suggest that Lpro plays a pivotal role in modulating several pathways of the immune response. Furthermore, manipulation of the Lpro coding region may serve as a viable strategy to derive live attenuated strains with potential for development as effective vaccines against foot-and-mouth disease.
INTRODUCTION
Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is one of the most contagious diseases of livestock animals. The etiologic agent, FMD virus (FMDV), infects cloven-hoofed animals, including cattle and swine, causing a devastating disease that can significantly impact the economy of affected countries (33). The virus is the prototype member of the Aphthovirus genus of the Picornaviridae family and consists of a positive-sense single-stranded RNA genome of about 8,000 nucleotides surrounded by an icosahedral capsid containing 60 copies each of four structural proteins. Upon infection, the viral RNA is translated as a single polyprotein which is concurrently processed by three virus-encoded proteins, leader (Lpro), 2A, and 3Cpro, into precursors and mature structural (VP1, VP2, VP3, and VP4) and nonstructural (NS) (Lpro, 2A, 2B, 2C, 3A, 3B1,2,3, 3Cpro, and 3Dpol) proteins (67).
Control of FMD is achieved by vaccination, inhibition of movement of susceptible animals, slaughter of infected and FMD-susceptible contact animals, and decontamination. The current commercial FMD vaccine, a chemically inactivated whole-virus preparation emulsified with adjuvant, is most commonly used in enzootic areas, and it has been very successful in reducing the number of outbreaks worldwide (33). However, this vaccine platform has some deficiencies: (i) the vaccine manufacturing requires a biosafety level 3 (BSL3) containment facility, (ii) unless highly purified, the vaccine does not allow differentiation between infected and vaccinated animals (DIVAs), (iii) there is a potential risk of developing asymptomatic disease carriers upon exposure of vaccinated animals to infectious virus, and (iv) affected countries need more time to regain FMD-free status and resume trading if vaccination rather than slaughter is used. To address some of the disadvantages of the inactivated vaccine, we have developed a new approach using a replication-defective adenovirus subunit vaccine expressing empty viral capsids that has been very successful in swine and cattle (36, 51, 63). Nevertheless, both the inactivated and the subunit vaccines require approximately 7 days to induce protection. It has been reported that rapid and long-lasting protection against viral infection is usually best achieved by vaccination with attenuated viral vaccines. Indeed, some viral diseases, including smallpox and rinderpest, have been eradicated using such vaccines (30, 56). So far, no attenuated vaccine has been successfully used against FMDV. Among others, a candidate attenuated vaccine was previously developed by deletion of the NS viral Lpro coding region (leaderless virus) (64). Despite the reduced pathogenicity of this virus in swine and cattle, vaccinated animals were not completely protected against homologous wild-type (WT) virus challenge, probably due to the slow and limited viral replication of the mutant strain.
FMDV has evolved several mechanisms to evade the host immune response, and Lpro plays a central role in pathogenesis (35). Lpro is a papain-like proteinase that autocatalytically removes itself from the growing polypeptide chain (74) and cleaves the host translation initiation factor eIF4G, resulting in the shutoff of host cap-dependent mRNA translation (22), a characteristic of most picornavirus infections (29). As mentioned above, it has been demonstrated that a virus lacking the Lpro coding region, leaderless virus, is highly attenuated in cattle and swine (12, 48, 64). Apparently, the reason for this attenuation is the inability of the virus to block type I interferon (alpha/beta interferon [IFN-α/β]) translation (14) and transcription of IFN-β (19), similar to other picornaviruses (5, 18, 46). Inhibition of IFN-β transcription is associated with Lpro translocation to the nucleus of the infected cell and subsequent degradation of p65/RelA, a subunit of transcription factor nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) (20). We have recently identified a conserved protein domain within the Lpro coding region known as the SAF-A/B, acinus, and PIAS (SAP) domain (21). SAP domains which are present in some DNA binding proteins usually involved in transcriptional control mediate protein-protein interactions between activators and repressors (1, 41). Mutations of two conserved amino acid residues in the SAP domain of FMDV Lpro altered the protein subcellular localization during the course of infection, making the virus (SAP-mutant virus [A12-SAP]) unable to induce degradation of NF-κB and thus resulting in upregulation of expression of several cytokines, chemokines, and interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) (21).
Upon viral infection, NF-κB translocates to the nucleus of the cell, where it binds to its cognate promoter sites to activate transcription of an array of genes, including proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules, most of them involved in the natural response against pathogens (50). Apart from a role in the adaptive immune response, NF-κB also has a very important function in innate immunity by the activation of the Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activators of transcription (STAT) antiviral pathway (39). Furthermore, proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TFN-α), directly induced by NF-κB, are also involved in the establishment of an antiviral state against RNA viruses (7).
Inflammatory cytokines are divided into two major groups, depending on their action in the organism: proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α, and IFNs) and anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10). A dynamic balance exists between pro- and anti-inflammatory components (57) that could be disrupted upon viral infection. Previous studies have shown that during acute FMDV infection in swine, the virus induces an immunosuppressive stage, characterized by T cell unresponsiveness and transient lymphopenia affecting all T cell subsets and correlating with the appearance of viremia (3, 26). One possible mechanism by which the virus induces immunosuppression might be related to the production of IL-10 (25), an immunosuppressive cytokine that plays an important stimulatory role in the function of B lymphocytes and the production of antibodies by B1 lymphocytes (2). In addition, FMDV interferes with expression of type I IFNs, which are effective in inhibiting virus replication in vitro and in vivo (13, 19, 23, 24, 52, 53). Little is known about the role of FMDV in modulating the expression of other cytokines; however, it has been reported that NS proteins of other picornaviruses inhibit secretion of IL-6 in tissue culture (15).
In the present study, we demonstrate that A12-SAP FMDV is attenuated not only in vitro but also in vivo. Intradermal (i.d.) inoculation of swine with high doses (105 to 107 PFU/animal) of A12-SAP did not result in detectable clinical signs, viremia, or virus shedding. A strong adaptive immune response comparable to that induced in animals infected with WT virus (A12-WT) was elicited, and animals inoculated with A12-SAP were completely protected when challenged with A12-WT virus 21 days after inoculation. Interestingly, inoculated animals were also completely protected when challenged as early as 2 days after vaccination, a time when the adaptive immune response could not be detected. Analysis of cytokines in sera and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of FMDV WT-infected animals showed a decrease in the levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α and an increase in IL-10. In contrast, FMDV SAP-vaccinated animals showed upregulation in the levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 as well as IL-10. These results suggest that in vivo, Lpro-dependent inhibition of a proinflammatory response in combination with virus-induced lymphopenia may play an important role in allowing successful FMDV infection and spread within the host.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cells and viruses.
Porcine kidney (IBRS-2) cell lines were obtained from the Foreign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory (FADDL) at the Plum Island Animal Disease Center. These cells were maintained in minimal essential medium (MEM; Gibco BRL, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and supplemented with 1% antibiotics and nonessential amino acids. BHK-21 cells (baby hamster kidney cells, strain 21, clone 13, ATCC CL10), obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA), were used to propagate virus stocks and to measure virus titers. BHK-21 cells were maintained in MEM containing 10% calf serum and 10% tryptose phosphate broth supplemented with 1% antibiotics and nonessential amino acids. Cell cultures were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2.
FMDV A12-WT was generated from the full-length serotype A12 infectious clone pRMC35 (66). A12-SAP-mutant virus, a derivative of A12-WT containing mutations I55A and L58A in the Lpro region, was constructed by site-directed mutagenesis (21). All viruses were propagated in BHK-21 cells, concentrated by polyethylene glycol precipitation, titrated on the same cells, and stored at −70°C. Viruses of passage 6 for A12-WT and passage 5 for A12-SAP were used for all experiments, and the full-length sequences were confirmed by DNA sequencing of derived viral cDNA using an ABI Prism 7000 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).
Animal experiments.
Animal experiments were performed in the high-containment facilities of the Plum Island Animal Disease Center following a protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Use and Care Committee. In a first experiment, 15 Yorkshire guilts (age, 5 weeks; weight, approximately 40 lb each) were divided into 5 groups of 3 animals each. Animals were inoculated i.d. in the heel bulb of the right hind foot with different doses of FMDV A12-WT (1 × 105 or 1 × 106 PFU/animal) or A12-SAP (1 × 105, 1 × 106, or 1 × 107 PFU/animal). Rectal temperatures and clinical signs, including lameness and vesicular lesions, were monitored daily during the first week postinoculation, and samples of serum and nasal swabs were collected on a daily basis. Serum samples were also collected at 14 and 21 days postinoculation (dpi). Clinical scores were determined by the number of toes presenting FMD lesions plus the presence of lesions in the snout and/or mouth. The maximum score was 17, and lesions restricted to the site of inoculation were not counted. Those pigs inoculated with A12-SAP were challenged 21 days later with 1 × 105 PFU/pig of FMDV A12-WT i.d. in the heel bulb of the left hind limb. Clinical signs and samples were collected on a daily basis for 7 days, and serum samples were also collected at 14 and 21 days postchallenge (dpc).
In a second experiment, 4 groups of 3 Yorkshire guilts each (age, 5 weeks; weight, approximately 40 lb) were subcutaneously (s.c.) vaccinated with attenuated FMDV A12-SAP (1 × 106 PFU/animal) followed by challenge at different times postvaccination (2, 4, 7, and 14 days postvaccination [dpv]) with 5 × 105 PFU/animal of virulent FMDV A12-WT i.d. in the heel bulb. One extra group of 3 pigs was inoculated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and challenged 14 days later (control group). Serum samples were collected at 2, 4, 7, and 14 dpv. After the challenge, clinical signs were monitored daily during the first week, and samples were collected as described for the first experiment.
Virus titration in serum and nasal swabs.
Serum and nasal swabs were assayed for the presence of virus by plaque titration on BHK-21 cells (passage levels 60 to 70). Serial 10-fold dilutions of the samples were allowed to adsorb on monolayers of BHK-21 cells grown in 6-well plates. Following 1 h adsorption, the inoculum was removed and 2 ml of MEM containing antibiotics, essential amino acids, and 0.6% gum tragacanth was added to each well. The plates were incubated for 24 h at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 and then stained with a crystal violet-formalin solution to visualize the plaques. Virus titers were expressed as log10 PFU per ml of serum or nasal swab. The detection level of this assay is 5 PFU/ml.
Detection of FMDV RNA by rRT-PCR.
At 1 to 7 dpc, frozen serum samples from animals that had no detectable clinical disease were thawed and processed for RNA extraction and measurement of specific FMDV RNA by real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) as previously described (58). Samples were considered positive when threshold cycle (CT) values were <40.
Determination of neutralizing antibody titer.
Serum samples were tested for the presence of FMDV-specific neutralizing antibodies by a plaque reduction neutralization assay as previously described (48). Neutralizing titers were reported as the serum dilution yielding a 70% reduction in the number of plaques (PRN70) induced by FMDV A12-WT in BHK-21 cells.
RIP of [35S]methionine/[35S]cysteine-labeled FMDV A12-infected cell lysates with swine serum samples.
Radiolabeled lysates of FMDV A12-infected BHK-21 cells were incubated with individual swine serum samples from 0 and 21 dpc and examined for the presence of antibodies specific to FMDV structural and NS polypeptides by radioimmunoprecipitation (RIP) (34). Convalescent-phase serum from an FMDV-infected bovine was used as a positive control. After 60 min incubation at room temperature, antibodies were precipitated with Staphylococcus aureus protein A. Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE on a 15% gel and visualized by autoradiography.
Quantification of antibody isotypes by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
The presence of FMDV-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM), IgG1, and IgG2 antibodies was detected by an indirect double-antibody sandwich assay as described previously (17), with some modifications. Briefly, Costar enzyme immunoassay/radioimmunoassay high-binding 96-well flat-bottom plates (Corning, NY) were coated with anti-FMDV antibody and incubated with an optimal dilution of either positive or negative FMDV antigen (17) prior to addition of test sera. Positive-control sera for IgM or for IgG1 and IgG2 were obtained from a swine inoculated with virulent FMDV A24 at 7 or 21 dpc, respectively. Positive-control sera were chosen for their ability to generate a definitive signal in their respective isotype-specific assays. Negative-control sera for each assay were preimmune sera from the same animals.
Analysis of cytokines in serum.
IFN-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α protein concentrations in sera from infected animals were determined using an ELISA. IFN-α was detected using monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) K9 and F17 (PBL Interferon Source, Piscataway, NJ) as previously described (52). IL-10 Cytoset ELISA (Biosource-Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α Duo Set ELISAs (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) were performed following the manufacturers' directions. All ELISAs were developed with 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) from KPL (Gaithersburg, MD). The absorbance at 450 nm was measured in an ELISA reader (VersaMax; Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). Cytokine concentrations were calculated on the basis of the optical densities obtained with the standards and are expressed in relative levels for each individual at different times postinfection with respect to its own level at day 0.
Detection of cytokines in PBMCs by real-time PCR.
Expression of several cytokines in PBMCs was analyzed. RNA was extracted from purified PBMCs, approximately 107 cells, by utilizing an RNeasy miniprep kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). A quantitative rRT-PCR method was used to evaluate the mRNA levels of several cytokines: for IFN-α, primers 236FW (5′ TGGTGCATGAGATGCTCCA) and 290RW (5′ GCCGAGCCCTCTGTGCT) and probe FAM-CAGACCTTCCAGCTCT (where FAM is 6-carboxyfluorescein); for IL-1β, primers 737FW (5′ TTGAATTCGAGTCTGCCCTGT) and 812RW (5′ CCCAGGAAGACGGGCTTT) and probe FAM-CAACTGGTACATCAGCACCTCTCAAGCAGAA; for IL-6, primers 478FW (5′ AATGTCGAGGCTGTGCAGATT) and 559RW (5′ TGGTGGCTTTGTCTGGATTCT) and probe FAM-AGCACTGATCCAGACCCTGAGGCAAA; for IL-10, primers 138FW (5′ TGAGAACAGCTGCATCCACTTC) and 241RW (5′ TCTGGTCCTTCGTTTGAAAGAAA) and probe FAM-CAACCAGCCTGCCCCACATGC; and for TNF-α, primers 338FW (5′TGGCCCCTTGAGCATCA) and 405RW (5′ CGGGCTTATCTGAGGTTTGAGA) and probe FAM-CCCTCTGGCCCAAGGACTCAGATCA. Porcine glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as the internal control to normalize the values for each sample (primers 327FW [5′ CGTCCCTGAGACACGATGGT] and 380RW [5′ CCCGATGCGGCCAAAT] and probe FAM-AAGGTCGGAGTGAACG). Reactions were performed in an ABI Prism 7500 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems). Relative mRNA levels were determined by comparative cycle threshold analysis (user bulletin 2; Applied Biosystems) utilizing as a reference the samples at 0 dpi.
Intracellular cytokine staining (ICCS).
CD8+ IFN-γ-producing cells in total PBMCs were analyzed by flow cytometry after specific stimulation with FMDV A12-WT or with a nonspecific stimulator (phorbol myristate acetate plus Ca ionophore) for 18 h at 37°C in 5% CO2. Nonspecific stimulus was used as a negative control. Cells were thereafter incubated with GolgiStop protein transport inhibitor (BD Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, NJ), according to the manufacturer's recommendations, followed by pelleting and resuspension in staining buffer (10% FBS in PBS). To analyze the expression of cell surface molecules, biotinylated mouse anti-porcine CD8 (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL) detected by streptavidin conjugated with peridinin chlorophyll protein (BD-Pharmingen) was used. After staining, cells were fixed and permeabilized with BD Cytoperm/Cytofix (BD Biosciences) for 30 min at 4°C, washed in BD Perm/wash buffer three times, and finally stained intracellularly with mouse anti-porcine IFN-γ conjugated with R-phycoerythrin (BD-Pharmingen). Cells were acquired using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Bioscience). Dead cells were excluded on the basis of forward and side light scatter. Data were analyzed with CellQuest software (BD Bioscience).
Statistical analyses.
Data handling and analysis and graphic representation were performed using Prism (version 5.0) software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA) or the Microsoft Excel program. Statistical differences were determined using a Student t test (P < 0.05, P < 0.01, P < 0.005).
RESULTS
FMDV SAP mutant is attenuated in swine.
To compare the virulence of the FMDV WT, A12-WT, with that of an FMDV mutant containing mutations in the SAP domain of Lpro (A12-SAP) (21), groups of three pigs were inoculated i.d. in the rear heel bulb with different doses of either FMDV. We inoculated animals with 105 or 106 PFU/animal of A12-WT, doses that we had previously shown caused clinical disease in swine (12), and with 105, 106, and 107 PFU/animal of A12-SAP. In animals inoculated with WT virus, disease was detectable as early as 2 dpc, but only the group inoculated with 106 PFU/animal had temperatures of 40°C or higher. By 7 dpc, all animals inoculated with WT virus showed clinical signs of disease, with no statistically significant differences between the two groups (Fig. 1A). However, all animals inoculated with A12-SAP, even those inoculated with a 10-fold higher dose than WT (107 PFU/animal), never showed clinical signs or elevated temperatures throughout the experiment (Fig. 1A).
Fig 1.
Clinical outcome after FMDV A12-WT and A12-SAP inoculation. Groups of three pigs were i.d. inoculated with different doses of A12-WT (105 or 106 PFU/animal) or A12-SAP (105, 106, or 107 PFU/animal), and temperature and clinical signs (A) and the presence of virus in serum and nasal swabs (B) were monitored daily for 7 dpi. Clinical score is expressed as the number of toes showing lesions plus one more point scored when lesions were present in either the mouth or snout, or both (the maximum score is 17). Virus levels are expressed as the number of PFU per ml in plasma or medium (in which the swabs were collected). Each data point represents the mean (±SD) of each group.
Animals inoculated with A12-WT developed viremia on the day prior to (group inoculated with 106 PFU) or concomitantly with (group inoculated with 105 PFU) the appearance of clinical signs (Fig. 1B; CT values = 33 to 37) and lymphopenia (data not shown). Interestingly, none of the animals inoculated with A12-SAP had detectable viremia either by virus isolation (Fig. 1B) or by rRT-PCR (CT values ≥ 40 [58]), nor did they develop lymphopenia. In parallel to viremia, animals inoculated with WT virus had detectable virus in nasal swabs starting at 2 to 3 dpi, and only one out of three animals inoculated with 107 PFU of A12-SAP showed virus with a very low titer (<10 PFU/ml) in nasal swabs at 5 dpi (Fig. 1B). These data indicate that A12-SAP FMDV displays significantly reduced virulence in swine compared to A12-WT.
FMDV A12-SAP and A12-WT elicit equivalent adaptive immune responses.
It has previously been demonstrated that animals inoculated with an attenuated strain of FMDV lacking Lpro (leaderless FMDV) developed significant antibody titers against viral proteins in serum after 14 dpi (12, 48). In the current experiment, we observed that despite the absence of viremia, all the animals inoculated with A12-SAP developed significant levels of FMDV-specific neutralizing antibodies starting at 7 dpi, with a peak occurring at 14 dpi (Fig. 2A). No statistically significant differences between animals inoculated with A12-WT and A12-SAP were detected when all groups were considered. In order to test for the presence of total antibodies, including those raised against structural and NS viral proteins, we performed RIPs using the serum of inoculated animals at 21 dpi and a radiolabeled extract of cells infected with A12-WT. All A12-WT-inoculated animals developed antibodies against structural (VP0, VP1, and VP3) and NS (3Dpol) viral proteins, indicative of productive viral replication. Interestingly, all A12-SAP-inoculated animals, with the exception of animal 96, also had significant levels of antibodies against 3Dpol, despite the absence of detectable viremia or virus shedding (Fig. 2B). All the serum samples from the animals were negative for the presence of antibodies at 0 dpi (data not shown).
Fig 2.
Presence of antibodies in serum of inoculated animals. (A) Serum neutralization titers. The neutralizing antibodies of swine inoculated with different doses of A12-WT (105 or 106 PFU/animal) or A12-SAP (105, 106, or 107 PFU/animal) were determined at 0, 7, 14, and 21 dpi. Titers are expressed as the log10 of the inverse dilution of serum yielding a 70% reduction in the number of plaques (PRN70). (B) Immunoprecipitation of structural and NS viral proteins with serum of animals inoculated with different doses of FMDV A12-WT (105 PFU/animal or 106 PFU/animal) or A12-SAP (105 PFU/animal, 106 PFU/animal, or 107 PFU/animal). Cytoplasmic extracts of FMDV A12-WT-infected BHK-21 cells labeled with [35S]methionine/[35S]cysteine were immunoprecipitated with serum from infected animals after 21 dpi and with convalescent-phase serum as a positive control (lane C). The products were examined by SDS-PAGE on a 15% gel. (C) Antibody isotype profiles in swine sera after infection. FMDV-specific IgM, IgG1, and IgG2 were detected by sandwich ELISA at 7, 14, and 21 dpi. Each data point represents the mean (±SD) of each group. OD, optical density.
In order to characterize the FMDV antibody response, the specific Ig isotype present in swine sera after inoculation was determined. The presence of IgM was detected by 7 dpi in all inoculated animals, and the level of IgM peaked at 14 days and declined by 21 days, while the levels of IgG1 and IgG2 increased in all inoculated animals (Fig. 2C). Together, these data indicate that A12-SAP replicates in the animal, eliciting a strong adaptive immune response comparable to that of WT virus, but does not cause vesicular lesions, viremia, or fever.
Animals inoculated with FMDV A12-SAP are completely protected when challenged with FMDV WT.
In our previous studies, animals inoculated with the attenuated leaderless virus never showed clinical signs but were only partially protected when challenged with WT FMDV (12, 48). To test whether or not the animals inoculated with the FMDV SAP mutant were protected against FMD, we challenged the three groups of A12-SAP-inoculated swine with A12-WT (105 PFU/animal i.d. in the heel bulb) at 21 days. All challenged animals were protected, and none of the animals showed clinical signs (fever or vesicles) or the presence of virus in blood or nasal secretions (Table 1). As expected, the challenge acted as a boost, and the animals had increased neutralizing antibody titers by 7 dpc (Table 1).
Table 1.
Clinical outcome and presence of neutralizing antibodies in animals challenged with FMDV A12-WT 21 days after FMDV A12-SAP mutant inoculationa
| A12-SAP dose (no. of PFU/animal) | Animal no. | Challenge resultb | Neutralizing antibody PRN70c | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viremia | Nasal swabs | 0 dpc | 7 dpc | ||
| 1 × 105 | 90 | Neg. | Neg. | 2.4 | >3.1 |
| 91 | Neg. | Neg. | 3.3 | >3.1 | |
| 92 | Neg. | Neg. | 2.7 | >3.1 | |
| 1 × 106 | 93 | Neg. | Neg. | 3 | >3.1 |
| 94 | Neg. | Neg. | 2.7 | >3.1 | |
| 95 | Neg. | Neg. | 1.8 | >3.1 | |
| 1 × 107 | 96 | Neg. | Neg. | 1.5 | 3.0 |
| 97 | Neg. | Neg. | 2.7 | 3.1 | |
| 98 | Neg. | Neg. | 2.1 | >3.1 | |
The dose of the A12-WT challenge virus was 1 × 105 PFU per animal.
The animals were tested for 7 days after the challenge. Neg., negative (less than 5 PFU/ml).
The neutralizing antibody titer is reported as the serum dilution yielding a 70% reduction in the number of plaques (PRN70).
FMDV Lpro is involved in reducing the expression of proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α in swine.
Previous in vitro studies demonstrated that FMDV Lpro antagonizes the innate immune response by limiting the expression of IFN and ISGs (11, 14, 19, 20, 74). Furthermore, WT infection induces production of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, impairing T-cell proliferation (25). These data suggest that Lpro might play a role in the induction of an anti-inflammatory state, thereby impairing rapid virus clearance. In order to test this hypothesis, we analyzed the expression of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine protein levels in the sera of animals inoculated with A12-WT and A12-SAP for 4 days after infection. Figures 3 and 4 show the levels of IFN-α, IL-10, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α in the serum of A12-WT- or A12-SAP-inoculated swine. Relative values were plotted with respect to the basal levels of each cytokine at 0 dpi. In the case of IFN-α, animals infected with the highest dose of A12-WT showed a slight increase peaking at 2 dpi, although high variation within the group was observed. Similarly, there were not statistically significant differences in the groups inoculated with A12-SAP-mutant virus (Fig. 3A). In contrast, pigs inoculated with A12-WT or A12-SAP showed an increase of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, with a peak at 2 dpi (Fig. 3B). Although the variation of the levels of expression between individuals was high, all the animals had increased expression of IL-10 by 2 dpi compared with the levels observed at 0 dpi, and this difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Interestingly, the serum levels of the cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α dropped by 2 dpi only in the animals inoculated with A12-WT, independently of the inoculation dose and coinciding with the peak of viremia (Fig. 4). The difference at 2 dpi was statistically significant compared to the levels observed at day 0 (P < 0.01). In contrast, two of the three groups inoculated with A12-SAP (1 × 105 and 1 × 106 PFU/animal) showed an increase in the levels of IL-1β and IL-6 compared to the levels observed at 0 dpi, and the differences with respect to the groups inoculated with A12-WT were also statistically significant by 2 dpi (P < 0.01) (Fig. 4). Surprisingly, this effect was not seen in the group of swine inoculated with the highest dose of A12-SAP (1 × 107 PFU/animal). In the case of TNF-α, all A12-SAP-inoculated animals showed an increase by 2 to 3 dpi that was statistically significant (P < 0.01) for the low- and medium-dose groups (1 × 105 and 1 × 106 PFU/animal, respectively). At 2 dpi, the relative levels of TNF-α were statistically significantly higher (P < 0.01) for the three A12-SAP groups than the A12-WT-inoculated groups (Fig. 4C).
Fig 3.
Cytokine protein profiles in serum after FMDV infection. Levels of IFN-α (A) and IL-10 (B) in the serum of animals inoculated with FMDV A12-WT (105 or 106 PFU/animal) or A12-SAP (105, 106, or 107 PFU/animal) during the first 4 days after infection were detected by sandwich ELISA. Amount of protein is expressed in relative levels for each individual animal at different times postinfection with respect to its own level at day 0. The gray areas represent time points at which a statistically significant difference from the amount at 0 dpi was observed (P < 0.05).
Fig 4.
Cytokine protein profiles in serum after FMDV infection. Levels of IL-1β (A), IL-6 (B), and TNF-α (C) in the serum of animals inoculated with FMDV A12-WT (105 or 106 PFU/animal) or A12-SAP (105, 106, or 107 PFU/animal) during the first 4 days after infection were detected by sandwich ELISA. Amount of protein is expressed in relative levels for each individual animal at different times postinfection with respect to its own level at day 0. The gray areas represent time points at which a statistically significant difference from the amount at 0 dpi was observed (P < 0.01).
Vaccination with attenuated FMDV A12-SAP confers protection against challenge with FMDV A12-WT as early as 2 dpv.
Inoculation of animals with live attenuated viral vaccines can induce early and long-lasting protection. As mentioned above, the FMDV SAP mutant not only was attenuated in vivo but also induced a robust adaptive immune response that conferred protection at 21 dpi. In order to determine if inoculation with this mutant virus could induce rapid protection, groups of three swine were s.c. vaccinated with 1 × 106 PFU/animal A12-SAP, followed by challenge with A12-WT virus at different times postvaccination (2, 4, 7, and 14 dpv). Another group inoculated with PBS was used as a control. We decided to use s.c. vaccination to determine if this route of inoculation would induce the same level of protection as that obtained by i.d. inoculation. s.c. vaccination is a practical approach in the field and is commonly used for live vaccines. Control animals developed clinical signs of disease as early as 2 dpc, and by 7 dpc they had a maximum lesion score of 14 (Fig. 5), with fever starting at 3 dpc. In parallel to clinical signs, control animals showed the presence of virus in serum and nasal swabs with a peak at 3 dpc (Fig. 5). However, vaccination with A12-SAP-mutant virus conferred full protection, even in the group of animals vaccinated just 2 days prior to WT virus challenge. Only one animal in the group vaccinated 14 days before challenge showed one lesion, which was first apparent at 5 dpc, and virus was detected in nasal swabs but not in blood (Fig. 5).
Fig 5.
Clinical outcome of animals vaccinated with attenuated A12-SAP after FMDV A12-WT challenge. Groups of three pigs were s.c. vaccinated with A12-SAP (106 PFU/animal) and i.d. challenged at different times postvaccination (2, 4, 7, and 14 dpv) with 5 × 105 PFU/animal of A12-WT, and clinical signs (bars) and the presence of virus in serum (solid lines) and nasal swabs (dashed lines) were monitored daily during various dpc. Clinical score and virus levels are expressed as described in the Fig. 1 legend. The error bars represent the variation within the three animals from each group.
Detectable levels of humoral or cellular immunity do not directly correlate with early protection.
It is widely established that in the primary adaptive immune response, several days are required for the clonal expansion and differentiation of lymphocytes into effector T cells and antibody-secreting B cells. However, it has been reported that different levels of antibodies can develop as early as 3 days after FMDV infection (27). We evaluated the titers of neutralizing antibodies and stimulation of CD8+ T cells in all vaccinated groups before and after challenge. With the exception of the group challenged at 2 dpv, all the other vaccinated animals (4, 7, and 14 dpv) had detectable levels of neutralizing antibodies in serum prior to challenge (Fig. 6). All but one animal belonging to the group challenged at 14 dpv were completely protected against disease. Moreover, by 4 dpc, animals challenged at 2 dpv showed levels of neutralizing antibodies equivalent to those for the control group, even when viremia or virus in nasal swabs was never detected (Fig. 6). As expected, FMDV challenge acted as a boost in all groups which showed higher neutralizing antibodies by 4 dpc.
Fig 6.
Serum neutralization titers of vaccinated and control animals at the day of challenge and up to 14 dpc. The neutralizing antibodies of swine vaccinated at different time points (2, 4, 7, and 14 dpv) with attenuated A12-SAP (106 PFU/animal) were measured at the day of challenge (arrow) with A12-WT (5 × 105 PFU/animal) and at 4, 7, and 14 dpc. Titers are expressed as described in the Fig. 2 legend.
Analysis of a specific T cell response revealed a modest induction at 7 and 14 dpv. As shown in Fig. 7, before the challenge, there were statistically significant differences in the levels of CD8+ IFN-γ-producing T cells at 14 dpv (P < 0.05). After the challenge, control animals developed specific cell-mediated immunity, detected between 4 and 7 dpc. Interestingly, at 4 dpc vaccinated animals showed a clear increase in the number of CD8+ IFN-γ-producing T cells compared to the number on the day of challenge and to the number for control animals (P < 0.01), showing the capacity for a rapid response in primed individuals compared with control animals.
Fig 7.
Cell-mediated immunity induced by A12-SAP vaccination. Specific cellular response was measured by intracellular cytokine staining (ICCS). PBMCs from A12-SAP-vaccinated and control animals were extracted at different times before (dpv) and after (dpc) challenge with A12-WT and stimulated with homologous FMDV A12-WT, and the capacity of CD8+ T cells to produce IFN-γ was evaluated by ICCS. The percentage of CD8+ T cells that produce IFN-γ is shown. A vertical dashed line separates the data between vaccination and challenge. The error bars represent the variation within the three animals from each group. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.
A12-SAP vaccination induced the expression of TNF-α in serum and PBMCs.
As expected, animals that were challenged early after vaccination (2 dpv) did not show detectable levels of antibodies or cell-mediated immunity by the time of challenge. On the basis of these observations and results from the first animal experiment in which animals inoculated with WT FMDV showed a decrease in the level of some cytokines in serum 2 days after infection, while those inoculated with the attenuated SAP-mutant virus did not (Fig. 3 and 4), we decided to analyze the systemic levels of some pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines by ELISA in serum and by real-time RT-PCR in PBMCs (Fig. 8). Control animals challenged with A12-WT showed a statistically significant increase in the levels of IL-10 by 2 to 3 days postinfection and a significant decrease in the levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α starting at 1 dpi by ELISA (Fig. 8A). Similar results were observed when we analyzed the relative levels of cytokine mRNAs in PBMCs, in which we could detect an increase only of the relative levels of IL-10 in control A12-WT-infected animals (Fig. 8B). In the case of IFN-α, animals inoculated with A12-WT showed a decrease in the relative levels of protein by 3 dpi compared with the levels at 0 dpi (Fig. 8A), while no variation in the relative levels of mRNA was detected (data not shown). On the other hand, animals vaccinated with the SAP mutant showed a statistically significant increase in the levels of IL-10 by ELISA, as was observed in the first experiment (Fig. 3). For the other cytokines, there was an overall tendency toward increased protein levels at 2 to 3 dpi, but the variation was statistically significant only for TNF-α, which showed a peak at 3 dpi (Fig. 8A). IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α were upregulated, as detected by rRT-PCR starting at 2 dpi (Fig. 8B).
Fig 8.
Cytokine profile in animals inoculated with FMDV A12-SAP or FMDV A12-WT. Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines were detected in serum by ELISA (A) or in PBMCs by rRT-PCR (B). (A) Levels of IFN-α, IL-10, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α are expressed relative to the amount detected at day 0. (B) Relative mRNA levels of IL-10, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α were determined by comparative cycle threshold analysis utilizing as a reference the samples at 0 dpi. Only values of ≥2 are considered upregulated. The error bars represent the variation within the three animals from each group. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.
DISCUSSION
The FMDV NS protein Lpro plays a key role in antagonizing the innate immune response (35). We have previously reported that FMDV lacking Lpro is attenuated in swine and cattle; however, this virus is unable to completely protect animals against challenge with virulent FMDV (9, 12, 48). Recently, we constructed an FMDV mutant containing amino acid substitutions in a conserved domain of the Lpro coding region, A12-SAP, which is attenuated in vitro (21). Here we show that A12-SAP-mutant FMDV is also attenuated in vivo. Remarkably, mutation of just two amino acid residues contained within the Lpro SAP domain prevented virus spread and disease but was sufficient to induce complete protection against WT challenge. We show that inoculation with the FMDV A12-SAP mutant induces humoral and cellular immunity at levels equivalent to the levels found during infection with WT FMDV. More importantly, our study reveals that while animals inoculated with the SAP mutant significantly increase proinflammatory cytokines at early times postinoculation (2 to 3 dpi), WT FMDV infection results in suppression of this response, as reflected by lower levels of these cytokines in serum. This, in turn, correlates with complete protection against WT FMDV challenge early after vaccination with SAP-mutant virus (2 dpv). The most important question arising from these observations relates to the early activation of cytokine networks by the SAP mutant and the integration of these findings into the host capacity to mount an effective anti-FMDV immune response.
Dendritic cells (DCs) are the professional antigen-presenting cells responsible for mounting an effective adaptive immune response (31). Although FMDV can infect DC precursors in vitro, interfering with proper maturation, infection in vivo is abortive in swine (25, 55) and does not affect the capability of at least skin DCs and monocyte-derived DCs (moDCs) to present antigen (25, 55). Similar to infection with WT FMDV, the high levels of neutralizing antibodies and the induction of cell-mediated immunity in the animals inoculated i.d. with A12-SAP, even in the absence of detectable viremia or virus shedding, suggest that local skin DCs might have taken up antigen or become infected with FMDV, followed by lymphatic migration to the draining lymph nodes, thus eliciting a significant adaptive immune response. It is well characterized that during natural infection FMDV induces a strong neutralizing antibody response that ultimately clears the infection (16, 69). However, in our vaccine experiment one animal inoculated with the FMDV A12-SAP mutant developed mild disease after challenge with WT virus, despite the presence of significant levels of neutralizing antibodies. We believe that this animal was a nonresponder. Previous studies have shown that protection against FMD does not always rely on the levels of neutralizing antibodies, since resistance to challenge has been observed in animals showing low levels of antibodies and disease has been detected even in the presence of significant antibody titers (49). Recently, a cytotoxic T cell lymphocyte (CTL) response during natural FMDV infection has been reported (37). The idea that a good vaccine against FMDV should combine stimulation of both humoral and cellular responses has been considered for a long time (4), and several attempts to include T cell stimulation in FMDV vaccine strategies have been pursued (6, 32, 38, 62). However, none of the vaccine platforms evaluated to date are able to induce the same immune response as the natural infection. It is expected that use of a live attenuated vaccine platform could offer protection that better resembles the protection afforded by natural infection. One of the main concerns of attenuated vaccines is the possibility of reversion to wild type, especially for FMDV, given the high error rate of viral RNA replication and its quasispecies nature (10, 28). Tissue culture passage of SAP-mutant virus displayed remarkable stability of the SAP mutation for at least 12 passages (data not shown), suggesting that this mutant could potentially be developed as a live attenuated vaccine candidate. Inclusion of markers for DIVAs and additional mutations that stabilize the attenuated phenotype, decreasing the probability of reversion to WT, should be considered.
The transcription factor NF-κB can be activated by a variety of stimuli, including infection with picornaviruses (20, 60, 61). Activated NF-κB promotes the expression of over 150 target genes, most of which participate in the host immune response (59), and among them there are several cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-1, and IL-6 (40, 45). In the case of FMDV, NF-κB activation and translocation to the nucleus occur at a relatively early stage of infection, but at later times the p65/RelA subunit of NF-κB disappears from infected cells (20). Previously, we demonstrated that FMDV Lpro is necessary and sufficient for degradation of p65/RelA and that mutations in the Lpro SAP domain abolished this function (20, 21). Little is known about the influence of natural FMDV infection on the profile of proinflammatory cytokines in vivo. Increased mRNA levels of TNF-α and IL-1α have been reported in nasal tissue-associated lymphoid tissue of infected cattle at 7 days after infection and later (73). In our study, a consistent decrease in the levels of TNF-α, IL-1, and IL-6 in blood was detected concurrently with the peak of viremia in animals inoculated with FMDV WT. We observed similar effects in swine infected with FMDV serotypes Asia 1 and O1 Manisa (data not shown). Some viruses, such as cytomegalovirus (42), or, more specifically, some viral proteins, such as paramyxovirus V (47) and poliovirus 3A (15), can inhibit the secretion of IL-1 or IL-6. However, animals inoculated with SAP-mutant virus showed significant induction of TNF-α and maintained the levels of IL-1 and IL-6, in contrast to animals inoculated with FMDV WT. These cytokines play an important role in the acute inflammatory response to infection and in tissue repair (43). Several roles involved in the regulation of the adaptive immune response have also been described for these cytokines. For FMDV, TNF-α and IL-6 have been reported to be molecular adjuvants involved in the maturation of DCs (71). It is possible that increased expression of TNF-α results from the inability of A12-SAP to cause degradation of NF-κB, which ultimately induces an innate immune response sufficient to neutralize the virus, preventing the appearance of disease while improving the development of the adaptive immune response. Furthermore, IL-1 has been demonstrated to have antiviral activity against RNA viruses, including vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) (68). Although IL-6 does not have any known antiviral activity (47), its involvement in viral pathogenesis of vaccinia virus (44) or herpes simplex virus type 1 (54) has been demonstrated. Similarly, it is possible that IL-1 and IL-6 play a role in controlling FMDV replication and spread in vivo.
Another important molecule modulated by NF-κB that could be involved in early protection against challenge is IFN. It has been demonstrated that FMDV is sensitive to the action of IFN (11, 14, 53). We have previously demonstrated that, in vitro, WT FMDV interferes with full induction of transcription of IFN-β (19). However, in vivo, IFN-α mRNA or protein has been detected in WT FMDV-infected bovine and swine (8, 65, 72). We did not detect significant differences in the amount of IFN-α protein in the serum of animals inoculated with A12-WT or A12-SAP. Since there are 17 different types of IFN-α in pigs (70), it is possible that differences in other IFN-α subtypes might exist but were not detected. Alternatively, differences in the IFN levels might be detectable only in specific tissues, correlating with the number of virus particles present at the specific site of infection (8). Nevertheless, we have previously observed that a relatively large amount of IFN (≥1,000 pg/ml serum) induces protection against FMDV, but in some cases, protection has been observed even when no systemic IFN was detected (23). Therefore, at this point there is no evidence that the levels of systemic IFN induced by infection with different strains of FMDV play a clear role in pathogenesis.
The other cytokine analyzed in our study, IL-10, showed an increase in both animals inoculated with WT virus and animals inoculated with SAP-mutant virus. It has been demonstrated that FMDV infection causes the induction of IL-10, a molecule that modulates DC function early after infection, possibly favoring a Th2 cell/cytokine-like environment, thus inducing FMDV-specific neutralizing antibodies (25). Infection of animals with the SAP mutant triggers the expression of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1, TNF-α, IL-6), presumably through stronger activation of the NF-κB pathway. Therefore, IL-10 expression may blunt the proinflammatory cytokine response to avoid an exaggerated cytokine production that could lead to inflammation-mediated disease. Our results expand the concept that IL-10 is a key regulatory cytokine.
In summary, our results suggest that FMDV Lpro plays a pivotal role in modulating the innate and adaptive immune response to viral infection, affecting multiple overlapping pathways. Manipulation of the Lpro coding region has allowed us to derive a viable attenuated mutant virus that, when used as a vaccine, was able to induce complete protection from challenge as early as 2 days postvaccination. This observation highlights the potential of using live attenuated vaccine candidates to fight FMDV and deserves further consideration. Moreover, a comprehensive study of viral pathogenesis with WT and FMDV Lpro mutant strains should help to provide a better understanding of virus-host interactions and, it is hoped, facilitate the development of improved FMD countermeasures.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported in part by the Plum Island Animal Disease Research Participation Program, administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (appointment of Fayna Díaz-San Segundo, Marcelo Weiss, and Camila C. Dias), by CRIS project number 1940-32000-052-00D, ARS, USDA (Teresa de los Santos and Marvin J. Grubman), and by National Pork Board grant number 11-005 (Teresa de los Santos, Fayna Díaz-San Segundo, and Marvin J. Grubman).
We are thankful to Juan M. Pacheco for helping in assaying the viremia by real-time RT-PCR and Beatriz G. Matias for everyday support in the lab. We also thank the animal care staff at the Plum Island Animal Disease Center for their professional support and assistance. Finally, we thank Noemi Sevilla for helpful discussions, suggestions, and critical reading of the manuscript.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print 23 November 2011
REFERENCES
- 1. Aravind L, Koonin EV. 2000. SAP—a putative DNA-binding motif involved in chromosomal organization. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25: 112–114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Balabanian K, et al. 2002. Interleukin-10 modulates the sensitivity of peritoneal B lymphocytes to chemokines with opposite effects on stromal cell-derived factor-1 and B584 lymphocyte chemoattractant. Blood 99: 427–436 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Bautista EM, Ferman GS, Golde WT. 2003. Induction of lymphopenia and inhibition of T cell function during acute infection of swine with foot and mouth disease virus (FMDV). Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 92: 61–73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Becker Y. 1994. Need for cellular and humoral immune responses in bovines to ensure protection from foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV)—a point of view. Virus Genes 8: 199–214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Belov GA, et al. 2004. Bidirectional increase in permeability of nuclear envelope upon poliovirus infection and accompanying alterations of nuclear pores. J. Virol. 78: 10166–10177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Borrego B, et al. 2006. DNA vaccines expressing B and T cell epitopes can protect mice from FMDV infection in the absence of specific humoral responses. Vaccine 24: 3889–3899 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Bose S, Kar N, Maitra R, DiDonato JA, Benerjee AK. 2003. Temporal activation of NF-kB regulates an interferon-independent innate antiviral response against cytoplasmic RNA viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100: 10890–10895 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Brown CC, Chinsangaram J, Grubman MJ. 2000. Type I interferon production in cattle infected with 2 strains of foot-and-mouth disease virus, as determined by in situ hybridization. Can. J. Vet. Res. 64: 130–133 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Brown CC, Piccone ME, Mason PW, McKenna TS, Grubman MJ. 1996. Pathogenesis of wild-type and leaderless foot-and-mouth disease virus in cattle. J. Virol. 70: 5638–5641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Carrillo C, et al. 2007. Genetic and phenotypic variation of foot-and-mouth disease virus during serial passages in a natural host. J. Virol. 81: 11341–11351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Chinsangaram J, Koster M, Grubman MJ. 2001. Inhibition of L-deleted foot-and-mouth disease virus replication by alpha/beta interferon involves double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase. J. Virol. 75: 5498–5503 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Chinsangaram J, Mason PW, Grubman MJ. 1998. Protection of swine by live and inactivated vaccines prepared from a leader proteinase-deficient serotype A12 foot-and-mouth disease virus. Vaccine 16: 1516–1522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Chinsangaram J, Moraes MP, Koster M, Grubman MJ. 2003. A novel viral disease control strategy: adenovirus expressing interferon alpha rapidly protects swine from foot-and-mouth disease. J. Virol. 77: 1621–1625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Chinsangaram J, Piccone ME, Grubman MJ. 1999. Ability of foot-and-mouth disease virus to form plaques in cell culture is associated with suppression of alpha/beta interferon. J. Virol. 73: 9891–9898 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Choe SS, Dodd DA, Kirkegaard K. 2005. Inhibition of cellular protein secretion by picornaviral 3A proteins. Virology 337: 18–29 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Collen T, Pullen L, Doel TR. 1989. T cell-dependent induction of antibody against foot-and-mouth disease virus in a mouse model. J. Gen. Virol. 70: 395–403 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. de Avila Botton S, et al. 2006. Immunopotentiation of a foot-and-mouth disease virus subunit vaccine by interferon alpha. Vaccine 24: 3446–3456 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Delhaye S, van Pesch V, Michiels T. 2004. The leader protein of Theiler's virus interferes with nucleocytoplasmic trafficking of cellular proteins. J. Virol. 78: 4357–4362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. de los Santos T, de Avila Botton S, Weiblen R, Grubman MJ. 2006. The leader proteinase of foot-and-mouth disease virus inhibits the induction of beta interferon mRNA and blocks the host innate immune response. J. Virol. 80: 1906–1914 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. de los Santos T, Díaz-San Segundo F, Grubman MJ. 2007. Degradation of nuclear factor kappa B during foot-and-mouth disease virus infection. J. Virol. 81: 12803–12815 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. de los Santos T, et al. 2009. A conserved domain in the leader proteinase of foot-and-mouth disease virus is required for proper subcellular localization and function. J. Virol. 83: 1800–1810 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Devaney MA, Vakharia VN, Lloyd RE, Ehrenfeld E, Grubman MJ. 1988. Leader protein of foot-and-mouth disease virus is required for cleavage of the p220 component of the cap-binding protein complex. J. Virol. 62: 4407–4409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Dias CCA, Moraes MP, Díaz-San Segundo F, de los Santos T, Grubman MJ. 2011. Porcine type I interferon rapidly protects swine against challenge with multiple serotypes of foot-and-mouth disease virus. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 31: 227–236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Díaz-San Segundo F, Moraes MP, de los Santos T, Dias CC, Grubman MJ. 2010. Interferon-induced protection against foot-and-mouth disease virus correlates with enhanced tissue specific innate immune cell infiltration and interferon stimulated gene expression. J. Virol. 84: 2063–2077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Díaz-San Segundo F, Rodriguez-Calvo T, de Avila A, Sevilla N. 2009. Immunosuppression during acute infection with foot-and-mouth disease virus in swine is mediated by IL-10. PLoS One 4: 1–11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Díaz-San Segundo F, et al. 2006. Selective lymphocyte depletion during the early stage of the immune response to foot-and-mouth disease virus infection in swine. J. Virol. 80: 2369–2379 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Doel TR. 2005. Natural and vaccine induced immunity to FMD. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 288: 103–131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Escarmís C, et al. 1996. Genetic lesions associated with Muller's ratchet in an RNA virus. J. Mol. Biol. 264: 255–267 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Etchison D, Milburn SC, Edery I, Sonenberg N, Hershey JW. 1982. Inhibition of HeLa cell protein synthesis following poliovirus infection correlates with the proteolysis of a 220,000-dalton polypeptide associated with eukaryotic initiation factor 3 and a cap binding protein complex. J. Biol. Chem. 257: 14806–14810. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Fenner F, Henderson DA, Arita I, Jezek Z, Ladnyi ID. 1988. Smallpox and its eradication, 1st ed World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland [Google Scholar]
- 31. Fujii S, Liu K, Smith C, Bonito AJ, Steinman RM. 2004. The linkage of innate to adaptive immunity via maturing dendritic cells in vivo requires CD40 ligation in addition to antigen presentation and CD80/86 costimulation. J. Exp. Med. 199: 1607–1618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. García-Briones MM, et al. 2004. Immunogenicity and T cell recognition in swine of foot-and-mouth disease virus polymerase 3D. Virology 322: 264–275 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Grubman MJ, Baxt B. 2004. Foot-and-mouth disease. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 17: 465–493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Grubman MJ, Robertson BH, Morgan DO, Moore DM, Dowbenko D. 1984. Biochemical map of polypeptides specified by foot-and-mouth disease virus. J. Virol. 50: 579–586 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Grubman MJ, Moraes MP, Díaz-San Segundo F, Pena L, de los Santos T. 2008. Evading the host immune response: how foot-and-mouth disease virus has become an effective pathogen. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 53: 8–17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Grubman MJ, et al. 2010. Adenovirus serotype 5-vectored foot-and-mouth disease subunit vaccines: the first decade. Future Virol. 5: 51–64 [Google Scholar]
- 37. Guzman E, Taylor G, Charleston B, Skinner MA, Ellis SA. 2008. An MHC-restricted CD8+ T-cell response is induced in cattle by foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) infection and also following vaccination with inactivated FMDV. J. Gen. Virol. 89: 667–675 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Guzman E, Taylor G, Charleston B, Ellis SA. 2010. Induction of a cross-reactive CD8(+) T cell response following foot-and-mouth disease virus vaccination. J. Virol. 84: 12375–12384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Helin E, Vainionpaa R, Hyppia T, Julkunen I, Matikainen S. 2001. Measles virus activates NF-kappa B and STAT transcription factors and production of IFN-alpha/beta and IL-6 in the human lung epithelial cell line A549. Virology 10: 1–10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Hiscott J, et al. 1993. Characterization of a functional NF-kappa B site in the human interleukin 1 beta promoter: evidence for a positive autoregulatory loop. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13: 6231–6240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Jang HD, Yoon K, Shin YJ, Kim J, Lee SY. 2004. PIAS3 suppresses NF-κB mediated transcription by interacting with the p65/RelA subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 24873–24880 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Kapasi K, Rice GP. 1988. Cytomegalovirus infection of peripheral blood mononuclear cells: effects on interleukin-1 and -2 production and responsiveness. J. Virol. 62: 3603–3607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Kishimoto T. 2005. IL-6: from laboratory to bedside. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 28: 177–186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Kopf M, et al. 1994. Impaired immune and acute-phase responses in interleukin-6-deficient mice. Nature 368: 339–342 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Libermann TA, Baltimore D. 1990. Activation of interleukin-6 gene expression through the NF-kappa B transcription factor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10: 2327–2334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Lidsky PV, et al. 2006. Nucleocytoplasmic traffic disorder induced by cardioviruses. J. Virol. 80: 2705–2717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Lin Y, et al. 2007. Inhibition of interleukin-6 expression by the V protein of parainfluenza virus 5. Virology 368: 262–272 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Mason PW, Piccone ME, McKenna TS-C, Chinsangaram J, Grubman MJ. 1997. Evaluation of a live-attenuated foot-and-mouth virus as a vaccine candidate. Virology 227: 96–102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. McCullough KC, et al. 1992. Protective immune response against foot-and-mouth disease. J. Virol. 66: 1835–1840 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Mogensen TH, Paludan SR. 2001. Virus-cell interactions: impact on cytokine production, immune evasion and tumor growth. Eur. Cytokine Netw. 12: 382–390 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Moraes MP, Mayr GA, Mason PW, Grubman MJ. 2002. Early protection against homologous challenge after a single dose of replication-defective human adenovirus type 5 expressing capsid proteins of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) strain A24. Vaccine 20: 1631–1639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Moraes MP, Chinsangaram J, Brum MCS, Grubman MJ. 2003. Immediate protection of swine from foot-and-mouth disease: a combination of adenoviruses expressing interferon alpha and a foot-and-mouth disease virus subunit vaccine. Vaccine 22: 268–279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Moraes MP, et al. 2007. Enhanced antiviral activity against foot-and-mouth disease virus by a combination of type I and II porcine interferons. J. Virol. 81: 7124–7135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Murphy EA, et al. 2008. Effect of IL-6 deficiency on susceptibility to HSV-1 respiratory infection and intrinsic macrophage antiviral resistance. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 28: 589–595 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Nfon CK, Ferman GS, Toka FN, Gregg DA, Golde WT. 2008. Interferon-alpha production by swine dendritic cells is inhibited during acute infection with foot-and-mouth disease virus. Viral Immunol. 21: 68–77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Normile D. 2008. Rinderpest: driven to extinction. Science 319: 1606–1609 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Opal SM, DePalo VA. 2000. Anti-inflammatory cytokines. Chest 117: 1162–1172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Pacheco JM, Arzt J, Rodriguez LL. 2010. Early events in the pathogenesis of foot-and-mouth disease in cattle after controlled aerosol exposure. Vet. J. 183: 46–53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Pahl HL. 1999. Activators and target genes of Rel/NF-kB transcription factors. Oncogene 18: 6853–6866 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Palma JP, Kwon D, Clipstone NA, Kim BS. 2003. Infection with Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus directly induces proinflammatory cytokines in primary astrocytes via NK-kappaB activation: potential role for the initiation of demyelinating disease. J. Virol. 77: 6322–6332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Papi A, Johnston SL. 1999. Rhinovirus infection induces expression of its own receptor intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) via increased NF-κB-mediated transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 9707–9720 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Patch JR, et al. 2011. Induction of foot-and-mouth disease virus-specific cytotoxic T cell killing by vaccination. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 18: 280–288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Pena L, et al. 2008. Delivery of a foot-and-mouth disease virus empty capsid subunit antigen with nonstructural protein 2B improves protection of swine. Vaccine 26: 5689–5699 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Piccone ME, Rieder E, Mason PW, Grubman MJ. 1995. The foot-and-mouth disease virus leader proteinase gene is not required for viral replication. J. Virol. 69: 5376–5382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Reid E, et al. 2011. Bovine plasmacytoid dendritic cells are the major source of type I interferon in response to foot-and-mouth disease virus in vitro and in vivo. J. Virol. 85: 4297–4308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Rieder E, Bunch T, Brown F, Mason PW. 1993. Genetically engineered foot-and-mouth disease viruses with poly(C) tracts of two nucleotides are virulent in mice. J. Virol. 67: 5139–5145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Rueckert RR. 1996. Picornaviridae: the viruses and their replication, p 609–654 In Fields BN, Knipe DM, Howley PH. (ed), Fields virology, 5th ed Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, PA [Google Scholar]
- 68. Ruggiero V, Antonelli G, Gentile M, Conciatori G, Dianzani F. 1989. Comparative study on the antiviral activity of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, lymphotoxin/TNF-beta, and IL-1 in WISH cells. Immunol. Lett. 21: 165–169 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Salt JS, Barnett PV, Dani P, Williams L. 1998. Emergency vaccination of pigs against foot-and-mouth disease: protection against disease and reduction in contact transmission. Vaccine 16: 746–754 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Sang Y, Rowland RR, Hesse RA, Blecha F. 2010. Differential expression and activity of the porcine type I interferon family. Physiol. Genomics 42: 248–258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70a. Strebel K, Beck E. 1986. A second protease of foot-and-mouth disease virus. J. Virol. 58: 893–899 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Su B, et al. 2008. The effects of IL-6 and TNF-alpha as molecular adjuvants on immune responses to FMDV and maturation of dendritic cells by DNA vaccination. Vaccine 26: 5111–5122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Toka FN, Nfon C, Dawson H, Golde WT. 2009. Natural killer cell dysfunction during acute infection with foot-and-mouth disease virus. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 16: 1738–1749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Zhang Z, et al. 2006. Cytokine and Toll-like receptor mRNAs in the nasal-associated lymphoid tissues of cattle during foot-and-mouth disease virus infection. J. Comp. Pathol. 134: 56–62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Zhu J, Weiss M, Grubman MJ, de los Santos T. 2010. Differential gene expression in bovine cells infected with wild type and leaderless foot-and-mouth disease virus. Virology 404: 32–40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]








