Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 14;16(12):126009. doi: 10.1117/1.3662454

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparison between noncorrected and motion-corrected SFDI processing on a stationary phantom-lesion measurement. The absorption versus wavelength plots (a) and reduced-scattering versus wavelength plots (b) in both results show no significant difference (<1.3%) between noncorrected and motion corrected data, thus implying that the proposed motion-correction technique does not induce artifacts into the data processing.