Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 2;10(3):1679–1715. doi: 10.3390/s100301679

Table 1.

Summary of the performance of microfabricated reference electrodes in the literature.

Electrode type Dimensions Fabrication Filling solution Test solution Electrode potential (V) Stability Year [Ref.]
Ag/AgCl 13mm × 1.5mm × 0.4mm Photolithography, Sputtering, Electrochemical oxidation None (quasi-RE) 0.1 M KCl in 20mM NaOH/KH2PO4 buffer, pH 7 90mV vs. commercial Ag/AgCl < 1mV in 24h, 1mV in 8h with saturated AgCl and KCl in solution 1998 [64]
Ag/AgCl 13mm × 1.5mm × 0.9mm Photolithography, Electrochemical oxidation, Bulk micromachining Saturated KCl, AgCl. Pin hole liquid junction 0.1 M KCl in 20mM NaOH/KH2PO4 buffer, pH 7 7mV vs. commercial Ag/AgCl <1mV in 3h. 1998 [65]
Ag/AgCl 13mm × 1.5mm × 0.9mm Photolithography, Electrochemical oxidation, Screen printing Saturated KCl, AgCl. Hydrophillic Polymer liquid junction 0.1 M KCl in 50mM NaOH/KH2PO4 buffer, pH 7 8mV vs. commercial Ag/AgCl <2mV in 100h. 1999 [66]
Ag/AgCl N/A (macroscopic Ag wire used) Photo-polymerization for junction polymer 1M KCl. pDADMAC plug junction PBS at pH 7.4 with 0.15M NaCl 19.3mV vs. commercial Ag/AgCl in 3M KCl <12mV in 30h. 2006 [69]
Ag/AgCl N/A Photolithography, Lift-off, Sputtering, Electrochemical oxidation Saturated KCl in Agarose supporting gel. 10mM KCl, pH range 4–10 0.45mV vs. commercial Ag/AgCl <1.5mV in 42h. 2002 [34]
Ag/AgCl 2cm×0.1 mm Electroless plating on glass, Electroplating None (quasi-RE) 3M KCl 13.5mV vs. commercial Ag/AgCl <30mV in 14 days 2006 [67]
Ag/AgCl 106 μm2 Photolithography, Chemical oxidation None (quasi-RE) 1mM KCl 32mV vs. commercial Ag/AgCl at 1mM KCl, with identical electrode variation of 10mV <2mV in 5000s 2006 [48]
Ag/AgCl 1μm diameter capillary Pre-made capillary and silver wire. Capillary action for salt bridge and filling solution 3.3M KCl + AgCl Distilled water (−4–0) mV vs. commercial Ag/AgCl <2 mV in 2400s 2005 [1]
Ag/AgCl 1.2mm2 Photolithography, Lift-off, Plasma chlorination None (quasi-RE) PBS (0.1M Na2HPO4, 0.15M NaCl, 0.1 g/l NaN3 at pH 7.4) 70mV vs. commercial Ag/AgCl electrode in 3M KCl <13mV in 5h 2003 [90]
Ag/AgCl 10mm×20mm Screen-printing thick film None (quasi-RE) Technical buffer with 0.05mM Cl ≈230mV vs. commercial Ag/AgCl <70mV in 12h 2001 [91]
Ag/AgCl 2mm×1.8mm (exposed area only) Sputtering, Ni layer added, Photolithography, Chemical chloridizing None (quasi-RE) 50mM Tris buffer (pH 7.4) with 3.5M KCl 0mV vs. commercial Ag/AgCl <1mV in 2h 2004 [92]
Graphite/AgCl N/A (macroscopic) None (macroscopic PVC encasing used) None (quasi-RE) KCl 0.1M 40.8mV vs. commercial AgCl in saturated KCl <0.2mV in 1h 2005 [53]
Hydrogen 4mm×7mm Evaporation, Lift-off, Galvanic platenization of Pt None. One variant uses pHEMA membrane KCl 1M −850mV vs. fabricated pseudo-Ag/AgCl (after 120–1100 s of initialization drifts) <1.5mV/h 2000 [85]
Ag/AgI 1mm diameter Sputtering, Lift-off, PECVD, RIE, Electrodeposition None (quasi-RE) PBS, pH 7.0 −94mV vs. SCE <1mV in 20h 2005 [73]
IrOx 0.1mm×1mm Photolithography, Sputtering, CVD, Electrodeposition None (quasi-RE) PBS 195mV vs. Ag/AgCl <20mV in 9 days, after initial 120 mV/day drift. 4mV std. dev. 2003 [30]
IrOx 1500μm2 Sputtering, Anodic growth (Electrochemical deposition) None (quasi-RE) 0.1M PBS 40mV vs. Ag/AgCl <100mV in 15 days 2005 [29]