Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 18.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2011 Dec 29;134(2):999–1009. doi: 10.1021/ja207173p

Table 2.

Analysis of Esq/hq in mV.

XDH XO Difference a XDH+NAD+ XDH+NADH
Esq/hq experimental −410b −234c −176 n.d. n.d.
calculated −407 −268 −139 −226 −346
uncharged proteind −343 −347 4 −406 −400
reference (water)e −172 −172 0 −172 −172
Esq/hq shift (from water to protein) Total −235 −96 −139 −54 −174
ΔEsq/hq(charge)f −64 79 −143 180 54
ΔEsq/hq(dielectric volume)g −171 −175 4 −234 −228
a

Em(XDH) − Em(XO).

b

At pH 7.5 3.

c

At pH 7.7 4.

d

Prepared by setting atomic charges of all atoms in the protein to zero.

e

See Ref. 31.

f

Influence of atomic charge of all atoms in the protein.

g

Influence of uncharged protein dielectric volume (i.e., the space covered by the merged van der Waals volumes of protein atoms).