Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Methods. 2011 Oct 21;55(4):310–317. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2011.10.011

Table 1.

Detergent Micelle Measurements

Detergent DLS Rh (Å)1 SAXS Rg (Å)2 a1 (Å)3 b1 (Å)3 a2 (Å)3 b2 (Å)3
DDM 35 33.2 ± 0.2 15.9 29.2 5.0 5.0
CHS:DDM = 0.1 38 37.3 ± 0.1 16.5 36.0 8.4 5.1
CHS:DDM = 0.2 41 44.8 ± 0.2 16.5 40.2 8.7 5.0
CHAPS:DDM = 0.2 32 30.3 ± 0.1 15.5 26.5 5.1 5.1
CHAPSO:DDM = 0.2 32 29.7 ± 0.2 15.4 26.5 5.1 5.1
Na Cholate:DDM = 0.2 32 30.7 ± 0.2 15.3 26.6 4.9 4.9
BigCHAP:DDM = 0.2 33 30.6 ± 0.2 15.4 26.5 5.3 5.3
BigCHAPdeoxy:DDM = 0.2 32 31.9 ± 0.2 15.3 26.5 5.4 5.4
Deoxycholate:DDM = 0.2 33 32.4 ± 0.3 15.0 28.1 5.0 5.0
Façade:DDM = 0.2 31 29.6± 0.2 14.9 25.7 5.9 5.8
CHOBIMALT:DDM=0.2 36 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
1

Hydrodynamic radius values measured via dynamic light scattering (DynaPro, Wyatt).

2

Radius of gyration values measured via SAXS Guinier analysis (Figure 3).

3

Parameters fit to a two shell ellipsoid model (Figure 3; [4]).