Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Appetite. 2011 Oct 8;58(1):242–248. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.10.003

Table 2.

Ratings of hunger and fullness of participants at three time points during the meal (n = 46 women)

Experimental condition
Significance1
No salad Ad libitum salad intake Fixed salad intake


Rating and time point Salad before main course Salad with main course Salad before main course Salad with main course Effect of timing (before versus with main course) Effect of method (ad libitum versus fixed intake)


Hunger (mm)2
 Before first course 62.3 ± 2.9 56.5 ± 2.8 61.2 ± 2.6 60.8 ± 2.8 60.5 ± 2.4 NS NS
 Before main course 62.8 ± 3.4 38.4 ± 2.6 63.1 ± 2.8 31.8 ± 2.6 64.8 ± 2.5 p < 0.0001 NS
 After main course 12.7 ± 1.7 7.3 ± 1.3 9.8 ± 1.6 5.6 ± 1.1 5.0 ± 0.8 NS p < 0.001
Fullness (mm)2
 Before first course 27.9 ± 3.0 29.3 ± 3.0 30.4 ± 3.0 29.0 ± 3.1 24.8 ± 3.0 NS NS
 Before main course 24.6 ± 2.9 53.2 ± 2.5 27.4 ± 3.2 57.5 ± 2.9 23.1 ± 3.1 p < 0.0001 NS
 After main course 77.2 ± 2.5 85.5 ± 1.4 82.3 ± 1.9 89.1 ± 1.7 88.6 ± 1.5 NS p < 0.0001
1

Significance of the given effect according to a mixed linear model with repeated measures; NS indicates not significant.

2

Ratings are from 100-mm visual analog scales