Table 2.
Logistic regression results to predict IVR utilization
| Baseline predictorb | Callers vs. non-callersa |
Frequent vs. infrequent callersa |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | P | OR | 95% CI | P | |
| Age | 0.494 | 0.229–1.066 | 0.072 | 1.390 | 0.767–2.519 | ns |
| Years of HIV/AIDS medical care | 2.907 | 1.067–7.921 | 0.037 | 0.940 | 0.515–1.717 | ns |
| Self-efficacy for safe sex negotiation | 2.145 | 1.012–4.546 | 0.046 | 0.800 | 0.396–1.616 | ns |
| Lost social support (NSSQc) | 1.020 | 0.451–2.309 | ns | 0.435 | 0.209–0.906 | 0.026 |
| ZTPId present-hedonistic subscale | 0.668 | 0.301–1.486 | ns | 0.558 | 0.288–1.079 | 0.083 |
| Sexual orientation (heterosexual) | 0.208 | 0.040–1.095 | 0.064 | 0.476 | 0.142–1.593 | ns |
Referent groups were non-callers or infrequent callers (on < 70% of IVR days).
Continuous predictor variables were z-transformed to allow direct comparisons among odds ratios (OR) adjusted to indicate a one standard deviation change in the predictor variable; dichotomous variables were not z-transformed; P-values are for the associated 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Norbeck social support questionnaire.
Zimbardo time perspective inventory