Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2012 Feb;16(2):432–440. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-9889-y

Table 2.

Logistic regression results to predict IVR utilization

Baseline predictorb Callers vs. non-callersa
Frequent vs. infrequent callersa
OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P
Age 0.494 0.229–1.066 0.072 1.390 0.767–2.519 ns
Years of HIV/AIDS medical care 2.907 1.067–7.921 0.037 0.940 0.515–1.717 ns
Self-efficacy for safe sex negotiation 2.145 1.012–4.546 0.046 0.800 0.396–1.616 ns
Lost social support (NSSQc) 1.020 0.451–2.309 ns 0.435 0.209–0.906 0.026
ZTPId present-hedonistic subscale 0.668 0.301–1.486 ns 0.558 0.288–1.079 0.083
Sexual orientation (heterosexual) 0.208 0.040–1.095 0.064 0.476 0.142–1.593 ns
a

Referent groups were non-callers or infrequent callers (on < 70% of IVR days).

b

Continuous predictor variables were z-transformed to allow direct comparisons among odds ratios (OR) adjusted to indicate a one standard deviation change in the predictor variable; dichotomous variables were not z-transformed; P-values are for the associated 95% confidence intervals (CI).

c

Norbeck social support questionnaire.

d

Zimbardo time perspective inventory