Table 4.
Unadjusted and adjusted associations between perception of safety and commuting physical activity in older adults. Florianopolis, South Brazil, 2009/2010.
| Variables | Unadjusted model | Adjusted model | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PR | 95% CI | P | PR | 95% CI | P | |
| Street lighting at nighta | 0.001 | 0.002 | ||||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Yes | 1.97 | 1.33; 1.92 | 1.89 | 1.28; 2.80 | ||
| Safe to walk during the daya | 0.86 | 0.97 | ||||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Yes | 1.03 | 0.77; 1.37 | 1.00 | 0.75; 1.32 | ||
| Safe to walk during the nighta | 0.46 | 0.05 | ||||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Yes | 0.94 | 0.78; 1.12 | 0.85 | 0.71; 1.01 | ||
| Perception of safety scoreb | 0.48 | 0.85 | ||||
| Poor | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Good | 1.10 | 0.83; 1.46 | 1.03 | 0.78; 1.35 | ||
aMultiple analysis consists of the variables street lighting at night, safe to walk during the day, and safe to walk during the night, adjusted for sex, age, schooling, disability score, and self-perceived health.
bMultiple analysis consists of the variable perception of safety score adjusted for sex, age, schooling, disability score, and self-perceived health.