Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 24.
Published in final edited form as: Omega (Westport). 2010;62(3):201–220. doi: 10.2190/om.62.3.a

Table 1.

Sample Characteristics and Complicated Grief Means for Categorical Background and Contextual Variables (N = 152)

N % Complicated grief a
Mean SD
Age
 Less than 65(b=1) 74 (49.0) 2.59 (.97)**
 65+(b=2) 78 (51.0) 2.19 (.69)
Gender
 Male 31 (20.4) 2.35 (.84)
 Female 121 (79.6) 2.39 (.87)
Race
 Non-Hispanic White(b=2) 148 (97.4) 2.37 (.86)
 Black 4 (2.6) 2.83 (.71)
Income
 Less than $15,000 17 (11.2) 2.23 (.81)
 $15,000 to $29,999 32 (21.1) 2.28 (.81)
 $30,000 to $49,999 56 (36.8) 2.45 (.88)
 $50,000+ 36 (23.7) 2.50 (.92)
 Missing 11 (7.2)
Education
 High school grad or less(b=3) 94 (61.8) 2.53 (.93)**
 Some college or advanced degree 58 (38.2) 2.15 (.68)
Relationship to patient
 Spouse 136 (89.5) 2.40 (.85)
 Adult child 16 (10.5) 2.22 (.98)
Expressed end-of-life care wishes
 Care preferences specified
  No(b=4) 95 (61.3) 2.24 (.44)
  Yes 60 (38.7) 2.60 (1.01)**
Family context
 Presence of children in home
  No(b=4) 142 (93.4) 2.31 (.82)
  Yes 10 (6.6) 3.19 (.95)**
a

p-Values reported for F test or t tests for significant difference in complicated grief.

b

Refers to the number of missing respondents who were included in this category.

**

p ≤ .01.