Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011 Sep 22;22(1):94–100. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2011.08.004

Table 1.

Comparison of antibody-based proteomic imaging methods.

Imaging Technique Resolution Multiplexing capability Live imaging compatible References
Multiplex tissue immunoblotting Multicellular Up to 20 antibodies No [911]
3D registration atlases (for organisms with high degree of stereotypy) Cellular Unlimited Yes [12]
Multi-epitope- ligand cartography / Toponomics Subcellular (0.2 × 0.2 × 5 μm) 100 antibodies demonstrated, theoretically more No [13,14]
Array tomography Synaptic (200 × 200 × 70 nm) 24 antibodies demonstrated, theoretically more No [15,16]
STED Synaptic- Subsynaptic (80 × 80 × 80 nm in fixed tissue) (65 × 65 × 500 nm for live imaging) 3 simultaneous colors. Potential for sequential multiplexing Yes [18, 19, 46]
STORM Subsynaptic (14 × 14 × 35 nm in fixed tissue) (30 × 30 × 50 nm for live imaging) 3 antibodies simultaneously; 13 demonstrated with registration using a synaptic coordinate system, theoretically more Yes [21, 29]
ATEM Macromolecular (0.5 × 0.5 × 40 nm) 11 antibodies demonstrated, theoretically more No [2628]