Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 25.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Behav Med. 2011 Jun;41(3):284–299. doi: 10.1007/s12160-010-9258-5

Table 4. Scores for intermediate outcomes by study group at baseline, 2 weeks, and 6 months.

Mediators Baseline (n=1,224) 2 weeks(n=776)a 6 months(n=1,026)



n % n % n %
Stage of changeb
Survey onlyc
 PC 33 8.0 7 4.5 14 6.1*
 C 232 56.3 48 30.8 120 52.0
 P 147 35.7 101 64.7 97 42.0
Web sitec
 PC 30 7.5 4 1.3 11 5.0
 C 220 55.3 83 27.3 90 41.1
 P 148 37.2 217 71.4 118 53.9
Tailoredc
 PC 32 7.8 7 2.3 14 6.1*
 C 217 52.9 78 25.2 80 34.9
 P 161 39.3 225 72.6 135 59.0
M SD M SD M SD
Knowledge
 Survey onlyc 2.47 0.96 2.61* 0.97 2.68* : 0.86
 Web sitec 2.42 0.96 2.68 0.88 2.70 0.90
 Tailoredc 2.49 0.91 3.00 0.82 2.88 0.87
Self-efficacy
 Survey onlyd 3.50 0.50 3.58* 0.46 3.56* 0.46
 Web site 3.53 0.50 3.59 0.46 3.57 0.46
 Tailoredc 3.53 0.49 3.68 0.40 3.64 0.41
Pros
 Survey only 3.44 0.43 3.36 0.42 3.37* 0.46
 Web site 3.47 0.41 3.42 0.45 3.46 0.42
 Tailored 3.48 0.44 3.42 0.47 3.41 0.43
Cons
 Survey only 1.74 0.60 1.58 0.51 1.67 0.57
 Web site 1.88 0.64 1.63 0.57 1.65 0.58
 Tailored 1.69 0.54 1.56 0.53 1.58 0.51
Social influence
 Survey only 2.85 0.67 2.68 0.69 2.81 0.68
 Web site 2.82 0.71 2.78 0.72 2.82 0.71
 Tailored 2.88 0.68 2.80 0.70 2.77 0.68
Single-item measures
Cancer worry (range 1–5)
 Survey only 1.93 0.92 1.96 0.80 1.96 0.82
 Web site 1.92 0.92 1.96 0.96 1.98 0.99
 Tailoredd 1.80 0.91 1.99 0.93 1.90 0.83
Comparative risk (range 1–3)
 Survey only 1.90 0.68 1.88 0.65 1.88 0.64
 Web sited 1.95 0.69 2.00 0.68 1.93 0.78
 Tailored 1.85 0.65 1.92 0.66 1.90 0.61
Absolute risk (range 1–5)
 Survey only 2.37 0.95 2.31 0.93 2.32 0.91
 Web site 2.43 1.00 2.40 0.98 2.35 0.94
 Tailoredd 2.29 0.93 2.35 0.09 2.27 0.89

For stage of change, a categorical variable, χ2 was used to test for statistical significance within and between groups. All other variables were measured continuously and were tested using ANOVA for between-group comparisons. If the overall between-group difference was statistically significant at p<0.10, we tested pairwise differences using ANOVA. Onesided binomial sign tests were used to test within-group differences for an improved mean at the 95% confidence level. For within-group comparisons, we compared baseline to 2 weeks and baseline to 6 months

a

For the 2-week comparisons, the sample size was reduced by half because participants were randomized to receive the 2-week follow-up survey or not

b

For the 6-month comparisons of stage of change, we omitted participants who had been screened during the study (n=344) in order to assess stage movement for those not screened. PC pre-contemplation, C contemplation, P preparation for action

c

Within-group difference from baseline to 2 weeks and baseline to 6 months are statistically significant at p<0.05

d

Within-group differences from baseline to 2 weeks are statistically significant at p<0.05

*

p<0.05 (overall between-group differences)

p<0.10 (overall between-group differences)