Table 1.
Potential Intervention Strategies
| Strategy | Priority Rating* |
|---|---|
| Develop electronic checklist to validate that all appointment components are ready and treatment can proceed | 108 |
| Split treatment-ready and non–treatment-ready patients into different processing paths | 103 |
| Improve appointment processes; establish dedicated quick-turnaround areas with specific staff assignments† | 100 |
| Identify resources to preview prescheduled appointments in advance to troubleshoot issues as early as possible | 100 |
| Improve communications; identify point person in each clinic, unit, pharmacy, laboratory, or business office for patient appointment–related issues† | 99 |
| Notify pharmacy earlier in appointment process so preparation of short-stability or high-cost drugs can start earlier† | 94 |
| Implement process of reconciling actual v estimated appointment data to use in refining scheduling process | 93 |
| Reduce room cleaning time | 90 |
| Dedicate another ATC unit for managing prescheduled appointments and walk-ins | 90 |
| Reduce cycle time for completion of laboratory work | 88 |
| Have phlebotomist and dedicated nurse to address IV access issues assigned to ATC | 88 |
| Publicly display patient wait times for chemotherapy | 84 |
| Treatment ready campaign to encourage providers to complete chemotherapy orders, review labs, and secure IV access | 68 |
Abbreviations: ATC, Ambulatory Treatment Center; IV, intravenous.
Priority ranking score determined by rating six impact and feasibility features of each intervention on scale of 1 to 3. Seven team members rated each intervention; individual ratings could range from 6 to 18.
Interventions selected for implementation based on priority ranking score and consultation with ATC management.