Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;119(2 Pt 1):220–226. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182429e0d

Table 1.

Clinician Recommendation of the Copper Intrauterine Device for Emergency Contraception (n=788)

Characteristics Recommended IUD for Emergency Contraception
Yes No

TOTAL, % 14.6 85.4
DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS
Age, mean years (SD) 48.4 (11) 48.6 (11)
Gender, %
 Female 15.6 84.4
 Male 12.5 87.5
PROFESSIONAL AND PRACTICE CHARACTERISTICS
Professional title, %
 Obstetrician–gynecologist 12.8 87.2
 Family medicine or other physician 14.5 85.5
 Advanced practice clinician: women’s health or ob-gyn 18.5 81.5
 Advanced practice clinician: other 11.6 88.4
Practice type*, %
 Private 11.1 88.9
 Public 18.9 81.1
Urban practice location, % 14.6 85.3
Contraceptive patient volume, mean annual (SD) 1,685 1020
IUD SKILLS, EVIDENCE-BASED KNOWLEDGE, AND PRACTICE
Number of IUDs inserted in residency or core training, %
 0 12.3 87.7
 Less than 50 15.1 84.9
 50 or more 18.3 81.7
Comfortable inserting copper IUDs, %
 No 5.9 94.1
 Little 11.3 88.7
 Somewhat 15.7 84.3
 Very 18.0 82.0
View IUC as safe, % 14.9 85.1
 Yes 8.9 91.1
 No
View patients as receptive to learning about IUC, %
 Yes 14.9 85.1
 No 14.5 14.5

IUC SKILLS, EVIDENCE-BASED KNOWLEDGE, AND PRACTICE
Routinely counsel contraceptive patients on IUC, %
 Yes 15.7 84.3
 No 12.9 87.1
Sufficient experience to counsel on copper IUDs*, %
 Yes 16.3 83.7
 No 7.3 92.7
IUC available at practice, %
 Yes 16.5 83.5
 No 11.3 88.7
Evidence-based patient selection scale, mean (SD) .29 (.6) −.05 (.6)
Evidence-based method attributes scale, mean (SD) .04 (.5) −.01 (.6)
Number of visits required for IUC insertion*, %
 1 34.4 65.6
 2 or more 15.4 84.6

SD, standard deviation; IUD, intrauterine device; ob-gyn, obstetrician–gynecologist; IUC, intrauterine contraception.

*

p≤0.01;

p≤0.001;

p≤0.05