Table 1.
Clinician Recommendation of the Copper Intrauterine Device for Emergency Contraception (n=788)
Characteristics | Recommended IUD for Emergency Contraception | |
---|---|---|
Yes | No | |
TOTAL, % | 14.6 | 85.4 |
DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS | ||
Age, mean years (SD) | 48.4 (11) | 48.6 (11) |
Gender, % | ||
Female | 15.6 | 84.4 |
Male | 12.5 | 87.5 |
PROFESSIONAL AND PRACTICE CHARACTERISTICS | ||
Professional title, % | ||
Obstetrician–gynecologist | 12.8 | 87.2 |
Family medicine or other physician | 14.5 | 85.5 |
Advanced practice clinician: women’s health or ob-gyn | 18.5 | 81.5 |
Advanced practice clinician: other | 11.6 | 88.4 |
Practice type*, % | ||
Private | 11.1 | 88.9 |
Public | 18.9 | 81.1 |
Urban practice location, % | 14.6 | 85.3 |
Contraceptive patient volume†, mean annual (SD) | 1,685 | 1020 |
IUD SKILLS, EVIDENCE-BASED KNOWLEDGE, AND PRACTICE | ||
Number of IUDs inserted in residency or core training, % | ||
0 | 12.3 | 87.7 |
Less than 50 | 15.1 | 84.9 |
50 or more | 18.3 | 81.7 |
Comfortable inserting copper IUDs†, % | ||
No | 5.9 | 94.1 |
Little | 11.3 | 88.7 |
Somewhat | 15.7 | 84.3 |
Very | 18.0 | 82.0 |
View IUC as safe, % | 14.9 | 85.1 |
Yes | 8.9 | 91.1 |
No | ||
View patients as receptive to learning about IUC, % | ||
Yes | 14.9 | 85.1 |
No | 14.5 | 14.5 |
| ||
IUC SKILLS, EVIDENCE-BASED KNOWLEDGE, AND PRACTICE | ||
Routinely counsel contraceptive patients on IUC, % | ||
Yes | 15.7 | 84.3 |
No | 12.9 | 87.1 |
Sufficient experience to counsel on copper IUDs*, % | ||
Yes | 16.3 | 83.7 |
No | 7.3 | 92.7 |
IUC available at practice‡, % | ||
Yes | 16.5 | 83.5 |
No | 11.3 | 88.7 |
Evidence-based patient selection scale†, mean (SD) | .29 (.6) | −.05 (.6) |
Evidence-based method attributes scale, mean (SD) | .04 (.5) | −.01 (.6) |
Number of visits required for IUC insertion*, % | ||
1 | 34.4 | 65.6 |
2 or more | 15.4 | 84.6 |
SD, standard deviation; IUD, intrauterine device; ob-gyn, obstetrician–gynecologist; IUC, intrauterine contraception.
p≤0.01;
p≤0.001;
p≤0.05