Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 3;11(1A):S161–S166. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2011.9041

Table 1.

Overview of studies on MR-HIFU for painful bone metastases

Study Patients Primary tumour (n) Location (n) Average duration, min (range) Average no. of sonications (range) No. of patients with 3-month follow-up (%) Pain responsea
Catane et al. (2007)[24] 13 (14 lesions) Breast (4) Ilium (10) 80 (22–158) 29 (11–39) 11/13 (85) 3 days after treatment: improvement in most cases
Prostate (2) Ischium (1)
Lung (1) Sacrum (1) 3 months after treatment: improvement in both pain score and dosage of pain-reducing medication
Renal (1) Humerus (1)
Colorectal (1) Femur (1)
Other (4)
Gianfelice et al. (2008)[25] 11 (12 lesions) Breast (5) Ilium (7) 28–103 12–18 11/11 (100) 3 days after treatment: OR=73% and CR=9%
Renal (4) Ischium (1)
Lung (1) Scapula (2) 1 month after treatment: OR=91% and CR=27%
Liver (1) Clavicula (1) 3 months after treatment: OR=100% and CR=45%
Liberman et al. (2008)[26] 31 (32 lesions) Breast (11) Ilium (18) 66 (22–162) 17.3 (8–32) 25/31 (81) 3 months after treatment: OR=72% and CR=36%
Renal (6) Ischium (4)
Prostate (5) Sacrum (4)
Colorectal (2) Femur (1)
Lung (1) Scapula (2)
Other (6) Humerus (1)
Clavicula (1)

Abbreviations: OR, overall response; CR, complete response.

aThe listed response rates are derived from the articles using the Update of the International Consensus on Palliative Radiotherapy Endpoints for Future Clinical Trials in Bone Metastases[37]. OR is defined as pain score of 0 without analgesic increase; CR is defined as pain reduction ≥2 without analgesic increase or analgesic reduction ≥25% without pain increase.