Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Chem. 2011 Dec 28;55(1):342–356. doi: 10.1021/jm201229j

Table 1.

Binding affinities of known A3AR antagonist 2 and truncated C2- and C8-substituted derivatives 4a–4r at three subtypes of hARs and A3AR-mediated inhibition of cAMP production

graphic file with name nihms343038u1.jpg
Compounds (R1, R2, R3) Affinity (Ki, nM ± SEM, or % inhibition)a Relative efficacy (%inhibition of cAMP ± SEM)c
hA1 hA2A hA3 hA3
2 (X = S, R1 = 3-I-Bn, R2 = Cl, R3 = H)b 2490 ± 940 341 ± 75 4.16 ± 0.50 4.2 ± 2.3
4a (X = O, R1 = H, R2 = 2-hexynyl, R3 = H) 740 ± 430 63.2 ± 15 138 ± 44 17.4 ± 2.4
4b (X = O, R1 = 3-F-Bn, R2 = 2-hexynyl, R3 = H) 9 ± 1% 25 ± 3% 570 ± 130 29.5 ± 5.5
4c (X = O, R1 = 3-Cl-Bn, R2 = 2-hexynyl, R3 = H) 9 ± 5% 42 ± 13% 150 ± 140 39.7 ± 3.8
4d (X = O, R1 = 3-Br-Bn, R2 = 2-hexynyl, R3 = H) 12 ± 4% 27 ± 4% 67 ± 18 37.2 ± 2.9
4e (X = O, R1 = 3-I-Bn, R2 = 2-hexynyl, R3 = H) 18 ± 2% 32 ± 9% 220 ± 50 31.5 ± 2.8
4f (X = O, R1 = H, R2 = 2-hexanyl, R3 = H) 10 ± 5% 2160 ± 270 39 ± 5% 22.3 ± 4.5
4g (X = S, R1 = H, R2 = 2-hexynyl, R3 = H) 39 ± 10% 7.19 ± 0.6 11.8 ± 1.3 2.8 ± 1.6
4h (X = S, R1 = 3-F-Bn, R2 = 2-hexynyl, R3 = H) 24 ± 5% 46 ± 5% 150 ± 80 47.6 ± 4.9
4i (X = S, R1 = 3-Cl-Bn, R2 = 2-hexynyl, R3 = H) 25 ± 2% 3730 ± 200 24.0 ± 6.0 47.2 ± 3.4
4j (X = S, R1 = 3-Br-Bn, R2 = 2-hexynyl, R3 = H) 12 ± 1% 3910 ± 970 24.0 ± 5.0 25.2 ± 3.0
4k (X = S, R1 = 3-I-Bn, R2 = 2-hexynyl, R3 = H) 15 ± 3% 4890 ± 840 39 ± 5 40.0 ± 5.6
4l (X = O, R1 = H, R2 = 2-hexenyl, R3 = H) 31.9 ± 1.2% 178 ± 26 218 ± 79 42.6 ± 3.1
4m (X = S, R1 = H, R2 = 2-hexenyl, R3 = H) 16.2 ± 8.4% 72.0 ± 19.1 13.2 ± 0.8 10.7 ± 4.1
4n (X = O, R1 = H, R2 = H, R3 = 2-hexynyl) 290 ± 70 27.2 ± 2.9% 31.7 ± 7.4 24.5 ± 2.9
4o (X = S, R1 = H, R2 = H, R3 = 2-hexynyl) 49.3 ± 4.9% 46.5 ± 4.3% 20.0 ± 4.0 1.7 ± 3.9
4p (X = O, R1 = H, R2 = H, R3 = 2-hexanyl) 18.1 ± 5.0% 5.8 ± 4.6% 24.7 ±2.1% 12.9 ± 2.2
4q (X = O, R1 = H, R2 = H, R3 = 2-hexenyl) 500 ± 140 27.3 ± 6.3% 94.2 ± 30.0 19.5 ± 2.4
4r (X = S, R1 = H, R2 = H, R3 = 2-hexenyl) 3.7 ± 2.9% 22.8 ± 6.4% 259 ± 10 6.1 ± 1.7
a

All binding experiments were performed using adherent mammalian cells stably transfected with cDNA encoding the appropriate hAR (A1AR and A3AR in CHO cells and A2AAR in HEK-293 cells). Binding was carried out using 1 nM [3H]-R-(-)-N6-2- phenylisopropyl adenosine (R-PIA), [3H]-2-[p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenyl-ethylamino]-5′-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (26, CGS21680, 10 nM), or 0.5 nM [125I]-N6-(3-iodo-4-aminobenzyl)-5′-N-methylcarboxamidoadenosine (27, I-AB-MECA) as radioligands for A1, A2A, and A3ARs, respectively. Values are expressed as mean ± sem, n = 3–4 (outliers eliminated) and normalized against a non-specific binder 25 (10 μM). Values expressed as a percentage in italics refer to percent inhibition of specific radioligand binding at 10 μM, with nonspecific binding defined using 10 μM 25.

b

Ref. 1.

c

Maximal efficacy (at 10 μM) in an A3AR functional assay, determined by inhibition of foskolin-stimulated cAMP production in AR-transfected CHO cells, expressed as percent inhibition (mean ± standard error, n = 3 – 5) in comparison to effect (100%) of full agonist 1a at 10 μM.

d

Data for compounds 4g, 4m, 4o, and 4r are from reference 11