Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2011 Oct 21;67(5):1478–1486. doi: 10.1002/mrm.23127

Table 3.

Difference of volumetric parameters from automatic analysis (with automatically detected contours only) and reconstructed analysis (with automatically detected contours plus additional ED slices) with respect to volumetric parameters from complete analysis (with final contours) (mean ± SD) R2 (n=1555 study participants). CO = cardiac output; EF = ejection fraction.

Automatic
analysis
Reconstructed
analysis
ED Volume (ml) (−43.0 ± 18.1) 0.71 (0.4 ± 4.1) 0.98
ES Volume (ml) (−0.1 ± 5.5) 0.88 (−0.3 ± 2.9) 0.97
Stroke Volume (ml) (−42.9 ± 17.0) 0.43 (0.7 ± 3.1) 0.98
EF (%) (−13.3 ± 5.1) 0.60 (0.3 ± 1.8) 0.93
CO (l/min) (−2.7 ± 1.1) 0.46 (0.0 ± 0.2) 0.98
LV Mass (g) (−27.2 ± 14.1) 0.79 (0.3 ± 6.8) 0.96