Table 2.
Growth Curve Models of Living Arrangement Effects on Health in China (N = 14,954)
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |
| Coef. (SE) | Coef. (SE) | Coef. (SE) | Coef. (SE) | |
| Fixed effects | ||||
| Intercept | 2.41*** (0.01) | 2.23*** (0.03) | 2.21*** (0.03) | 2.23*** (0.03) | 
| Age | −0.23*** (0.02) | −0.22*** (0.02) | −0.20*** (0.02) | −0.20*** (0.02) | 
| Age square | −0.03 (0.02) | −0.02 (0.02) | −0.02 (0.02) | −0.02 (0.02) | 
| Skipped generation | −0.03 (0.03) | −0.03 (0.03) | −0.03 (0.03) | −0.14** (0.05) | 
| Three generation (ref. category: noncoresiding) | −0.03 (0.02) | −0.02 (0.02) | −0.02 (0.02) | −0.02 (0.03) | 
| Paternal | 0.03 (0.02) | 0.07** (0.02) | 0.07** (0.02) | 0.07** (0.02) | 
| Age × Skipped Generation | 0.04 (0.05) | 0.04 (0.05) | 0.04 (0.05) | 0.04 (0.05) | 
| Age × Three Generation (ref. category: noncoresiding) | −0.16*** (0.04) | −0.15*** (0.04) | −0.15*** (0.04) | −0.15*** (0.04) | 
| Age × Paternal | 0.11* (0.04) | 0.09* (0.04) | 0.09* (0.04) | 0.09* (0.04) | 
| Sex (female = 0) | 0.09*** (0.02) | 0.01 (0.02) | 0.01 (0.02) | |
| Died | −0.23*** (0.02) | −0.22*** (0.02) | −0.22*** (0.02) | |
| Married | −0.02 (0.02) | −0.02 (0.02) | −0.02 (0.02) | |
| Urban | 0.06*** (0.02) | 0.06*** (0.02) | 0.06*** (0.02) | |
| Education (primary or less = 0) | 0.09*** (0.02) | 0.09*** (0.02) | 0.09*** (0.02) | |
| Income (lowest 20% = 0) | 0.08*** (0.02) | 0.08*** (0.02) | 0.07** (0.02) | |
| Working (not working = 0) | 0.14*** (0.02) | 0.13*** (0.02) | 0.13*** (0.02) | |
| Medically insured (not insured = 0) | 0.01 (0.02) | 0.02 (0.02) | 0.02 (0.02) | |
| Drinking | 0.12*** (0.02) | 0.12*** (0.02) | ||
| Smoking | 0.05** (0.02) | 0.05** (0.02) | ||
| Skipped Generation × Income | 0.14** (0.06) | |||
| Three Generation × Income | 0.00 (0.03) | |||
| Random effects–variance components | ||||
| Level 1: within-person | 0.15*** | 0.14*** | 0.13*** | 0.13*** | 
| Level 2: in intercept | 0.02* | 0.02* | 0.01 | 0.01 | 
| Level 2: in linear growth rate | 0.21*** | 0.20*** | 0.20*** | 0.20*** | 
| Goodness-of-fit | ||||
| BIC (smaller is better) | 34,501.60 | 34,241.70 | 34,177.00 | 34,178.70 | 
| −2 Log likelihood | 34,467.00 | 34,207.10 | 34,142.50 | 34,144.10 | 
Notes. *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001 (two-tailed test); BIC = Bayesian Information Criterion.