Table 3.
Growth Curve Models of Caregiving Intensity Effects on Health in China, Coresiding Grandparents (N = 7,712)
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
| Coef. (SE) | Coef. (SE) | Coef. (SE) | |
| Fixed effects | |||
| Intercept | 2.22*** (0.04) | 2.21*** (0.04) | 2.23*** (0.04) |
| Age | −0.30*** (0.02) | −0.30*** (0.02) | −0.30*** (0.02) |
| Age square | −0.07 (0.03) | −0.07 (0.03) | −0.06 (0.03) |
| High intensity | −0.05* (0.03) | 0.02 (0.03) | −0.09** (0.03) |
| Low intensity (Ref. category: no-care) | −0.01 (0.03) | −0.01 (0.04) | −0.04 (0.03) |
| Age × High Intensity | −0.07 (0.06) | −0.06 (0.06) | −0.06 (0.06) |
| Age × Low Intensity (Ref. category: no-care) | 0.16** (0.06) | 0.16** (0.06) | 0.16** (0.06) |
| Sex (female = 0) | 0.00 (0.03) | 0.03 (0.03) | 0.00 (0.03) |
| Died | −0.18*** (0.03) | −0.18*** (0.03) | −0.18*** (0.03) |
| Married | 0.00 (0.03) | 0.00 (0.03) | 0.00 (0.03) |
| Urban | 0.10*** (0.03) | 0.10*** (0.03) | 0.07** (0.03) |
| Education (primary or less = 0) | 0.12*** (0.03) | 0.12*** (0.03) | 0.12*** (0.03) |
| Income (lowest 20% = 0) | 0.00 (0.02) | 0.01 (0.02) | 0.01 (0.02) |
| Working (not working = 0) | 0.17*** (0.02) | 0.17*** (0.02) | 0.17*** (0.02) |
| Insured (not insured = 0) | 0.04* (0.02) | 0.04* (0.02) | 0.04* (0.02) |
| Skipped | −0.04 (0.03) | −0.04 (0.03) | −0.04 (0.03) |
| Paternal | 0.06* (0.02) | 0.06* (0.02) | 0.06* (0.02) |
| Number of children | 0.01 (0.01) | 0.01 (0.01) | 0.01 (0.01) |
| One parent present | −0.10* (0.05) | −0.10* (0.05) | −0.10* (0.05) |
| Drinking | 0.09*** (0.02) | 0.08*** (0.02) | 0.09*** (0.02) |
| Smoking | 0.08** (0.02) | 0.08** (0.02) | 0.08** (0.02) |
| High Intensity × Male | −0.23*** (0.05) | ||
| Low Intensity × Male | 0.02 (0.05) | ||
| High Intensity × Urban | 0.11* (0.05) | ||
| Low Intensity × Urban | 0.11 (0.06) | ||
| Random effects–variance components | |||
| Level 1: within-person | 0.16*** | 0.16*** | 0.16*** |
| Level 2: in intercept | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Level 2: in linear growth rate | 0.25*** | 0.24*** | 0.25*** |
| Goodness-of-fit | |||
| BIC (smaller is better) | 17,784.90 | 17,772.40 | 17,786.40 |
| −2 Log likelihood | 17,753.30 | 17,740.80 | 17,754.80 |
Notes. *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001 (two-tailed test); BIC = Bayesian Information Criterion.