Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 27.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Behav Med. 2009 Dec;38(3):213–224. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9148-x

Table 1.

Means, SDs, and sample sizes of study variables across the 16-month follow-up period

Months after baseline assessment
2
M (SD)
4
M (SD)
5
M (SD)
6
M (SD)
8
M (SD)
11
M (SD)
13
M (SD)
15
M (SD)
18
M (SD)
Satisfaction 4.45 (2.18)
n=234
3.88 (2.09)
n=191
3.73 (2.12)
n=183
3.70 (2.19)
n=212
3.87 (1.96)
n=157
3.60 (2.07)
n=155
3.62 (1.96)
n=123
3.61 (1.96)
n=131
3.42 (2.02)
n=192
Percentage change in weight from baseline 3.08 (2.97)
n=216
2.69 (3.97)
n=193
2.99 (4.56)
n=181
3.03 (5.42)
n=205
3.53 (6.47)
n=159
3.47 (6.62)
n=154
3.37 (7.09)
n=119
3.74 (7.40)
n=130
2.38 (7.15)
n=185
Weight-loss-related outcomes
 Amount of perceived self- control 4.66 (1.95)
n=235
3.80 (2.05)
n=192
3.64 (2.13)
n=185
3.36 (2.08)
n=213
3.54 (2.09)
n=157
3.35 (2.12)
n=155
3.18 (2.04)
n=123
3.39 (1.95)
n=130
3.88 (1.92)
n=192
 Perceived attractiveness 4.20 (1.74)
n=233
3.80 (1.83)
n=193
3.75 (1.82)
n=185
3.74 (1.87)
n=214
3.75 (1.92)
n=159
3.76 (1.89)
n=155
3.92 (1.76)
n=123
3.64 (1.92)
n=130
3.76 (1.89)
n=191
 Amount of positive feedback about weight 2.03 (2.27)
n=235
1.82 (2.23)
n=192
1.96 (2.33)
n=184
1.90 (2.41)
n=213
1.99 (2.38)
n=158
1.65 (2.33)
n=154
1.62 (2.19)
n=123
1.89 (2.25)
n=131
1.70 (2.22)
n=191
 Amount of negative feedback about weight 0.69 (1.43)
n=235
0.85 (1.61)
n=192
0.72 (1.47)
n=185
1.01 (1.88)
n=213
0.75 (1.56)
n=156
0.90 (1.71)
n=155
0.56 (1.24)
n=123
0.71 (1.50)
n=131
0.86 (1.59)
n=190
 Improvement in how well clothes fit 3.10 (2.22)
n=233
2.95 (2.47)
n=193
2.43 (2.40)
n=185
1.61 (1.97)
n=44
2.28 (2.41)
n=158
2.01 (2.38)
n=154
2.23 (2.37)
n=123
2.26 (2.48)
n=130
-
Weight-loss-related experiences
 Amount of effort following weight control plan 4.55 (2.28)
n=234
3.91 (2.15)
n=191
3.63 (2.09)
n=185
3.39 (2.27)
n=213
3.60 (2.20)
n=159
3.50 (2.39)
n=156
3.46 (2.13)
n=123
3.31 (2.18)
n=131
3.61 (2.10)
n=192
 Miss foods high in fat and/or calories 4.15 (1.99)
n=233
3.67 (2.08)
n=190
3.51 (2.08)
n=180
3.79 (1.85)
n=209
3.43 (2.16)
n=155
3.52 (2.35)
n=150
3.49 (2.17)
n=120
3.50 (2.11)
n=129
3.61 (1.92)
n=189
 Frequency of frustration dealing with weight 4.02 (2.19)
n=233
4.26 (1.98)
n=191
4.13 (2.04)
n=184
4.17 (2.14)
n=212
4.30 (2.16)
n=158
4.38 (2.23)
n=155
4.59 (2.03)
n=123
4.37 (2.19)
n=131
4.45 (2.13)
n=192
 Number of days weighing oneself 4.53 (2.57)
n=234
4.27 (2.62)
n=192
3.89 (2.74)
n=184
3.29 (2.71)
n=213
3.66 (2.50)
n=157
3.52 (2.63)
n=155
3.25 (2.55)
n=122
3.63 (2.52)
n=130
3.08 (2.67)
n=191
 Approached thinking about weight control efforts 3.64 (1.38)
n=233
3.78 (1.82)
n=190
3.43 (1.82)
n=182
3.34 (2.02)
n=213
3.56 (1.93)
n=157
3.31 (2.03)
n=153
3.17 (2.00)
n=121
3.31 (2.10)
n=130
3.52 (1.97)
n=188

Ns vary because of missing values. The variables were standardized so that the values reported in the table are all on a 0–8 scale. Because of an administrative error, improvement in clothes fitting was only measured among those participants at 6 months who completed the assessment via mailed questionnaire and it was not measured at 18 months