Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 27.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Behav Med. 2009 Dec;38(3):213–224. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9148-x

Table 2.

Univariate between-person and within-person associations between satisfaction and weight loss, outcomes related to weight loss, and experiences related to the weight loss process over 16 months

Model/experience variable Coefficient Standard error t value p value
Rε2
Percentage change in weight model 0.158 0.013 11.72 .0001a 0.178
Weight-loss-related outcomes models
Amount of self-control 0.380
 between-person association 0.331 0.044 7.44 .0001a
 within-person association 0.476 0.034 13.93 .0001a
Perceived attractiveness 0.265
 between-person association 0.173 0.045 3.82 .0002a
 within-person association 0.462 0.044 10.49 .0001a
Amount of positive feedback 0.233
 between-person association 0.161 0.043 3.75 .0002a
 within-person association 0.256 0.030 8.57 .0001a
Amount of negative feedback 0.209
 between-person association −0.122 0.056 −2.17 .03
 within-person association −0.198 0.044 −4.48 .0001a
Improvement in clothes fitting 0.291
 between-person association 0.340 0.043 7.97 .0001a
 within-person association 0.380 0.028 13.38 .0001a
Weight-loss-process experiences
Amount of effort exerted 0.380
 between-person association 0.200 0.044 4.51 .0001a
 within-person association 0.433 0.032 13.52 .0001a
Missing foods high in fat and/or calories 0.210
 between-person association −0.102 0.044 −2.33 .02
 within-person association −0.046 0.037 −1.24 .22
Amount of frustration 0.289
 between-person association −0.311 0.037 −8.44 .0001a
 within-person association −0.377 0.036 −10.54 .0001a
Number of days of self-weighing 0.229
 between-person association 0.017 0.033 0.52 .61
 within-person association 0.155 0.035 4.38 .0001a
Approach to thinking about weight control 0.307
 between-person association 0.464 0.059 7.93 .0001a
 within-person association 0.343 0.034 10.10 .0001a
a

Denotes statistically significant effect at p<.005; Rε2 =estimate of within-person variance in satisfaction explained by the model